Stakes

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
whitehorses
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:40 pm

Stakes

Post by whitehorses »

I'm working on a Henry V army but am confused by the virtues of Stakes(PD's);

- Each Longbow BG gets Stakes up to half their Bases
- Stakes once planted, count as FF v Mounted (Except Elefante)
- Stakes do not have a Rear like normal FF's

So do Stakes affect Mounted to cause Disruption? Or do they just give Longbows a + when taking Impact?
And why are Elefante discounted from being affected by PD's? It seems unlikely that their size 20 Feet could deftly step over or between the Stakes & charge the Longbomen behind :o



Cheers,
Jer
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Stakes

Post by rbodleyscott »

whitehorses wrote:I'm working on a Henry V army but am confused by the virtues of Stakes(PD's);

- Each Longbow BG gets Stakes up to half their Bases
- Stakes once planted, count as FF v Mounted (Except Elefante)

So do Stakes affect Mounted to cause Disruption?


No
Or do they just give Longbows a + when taking Impact?


They function exactly like FF vs mounted in close combat. Therefore they give the longbow + and cancel enemy lance POA. (Because attacking fortifications does not count as "in open terrain").
And why are Elefante discounted from being affected by PD's? It seems unlikely that their size 20 Feet could deftly step over or between the Stakes & charge the Longbomen behind :o
Because we think the elephants would uproot the stakes fairly easily.
Stakes do not have a Rear like normal FF's
I am not sure what you mean by this. They do, of course, have a rear. If they didn't, the longbows would not count as defending them.
whitehorses
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:40 pm

Re: Stakes

Post by whitehorses »

rbodleyscott wrote:
whitehorses wrote:I'm working on a Henry V army but am confused by the virtues of Stakes(PD's);

- Each Longbow BG gets Stakes up to half their Bases
- Stakes once planted, count as FF v Mounted (Except Elefante)

So do Stakes affect Mounted to cause Disruption?


No
Or do they just give Longbows a + when taking Impact?


They function exactly like FF vs mounted in close combat. Therefore they give the longbow + and cancel enemy lance POA.


Cosmic - deffo worth the investment then!
And why are Elefante discounted from being affected by PD's? It seems unlikely that their size 20 Feet could deftly step over or between the Stakes & charge the Longbomen behind :o
Because we think the elephants would uproot the stakes fairly easily.[/quote]

Fair enough - either that or their hide would absorb the Stakes & just trample on regardless.
Stakes do not have a Rear like normal FF's
I am not sure what you mean by this, nor what significance you think it has. They do, of course, have a rear. If they didn't, the longbows would not count as defending them.[/quote]


I mean that there is only a frontal Stakes & not a secondary set of Stakes behind, which I misread as the meaning of Front & Rear.
But if I've grasped it correctly, it means the front of the Stakes is counted for Shooting & CC, the rear of the Stakes must be in contact by the Longbowmen to count?

Cheers,
Jer
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Stakes

Post by rbodleyscott »

whitehorses wrote:But if I've grasped it correctly, it means the front of the Stakes is counted for Shooting & CC, the rear of the Stakes must be in contact by the Longbowmen to count?
jup
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

whitehorses wrote:

But if I've grasped it correctly, it means the front of the Stakes is counted for Shooting & CC, the rear of the Stakes must be in contact by the Longbowmen to count?

That's it and it just makes sure that you can't benenit from defenndng the stakes the wrong way around - who would ever try that one with the points towards you Ans: no-one in reality but if the rules allowed it some rule mongering would!!

Si

SP expesinsive investment but a good investment, but they do slow down your ability to attacka nd change the cahracter of your army - as they should of course.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Any plans to allow other types of PD's - eg caltrops?

Pete
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

petedalby wrote:Any plans to allow other types of PD's - eg caltrops?

Pete
Yes, we have firm plans not to allow caltrops. Romans are good enough against mounted already. (Perhaps they are using caltrops :wink: ).
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

To add...

we have followed a simialryl philopshy to POAs - only if "funny things" were a mjaor tactical dostrine that defined the character of a battle or army are they included. Stakes qualify due to HYW English and WWG for Hussites and barricades for Japanese or Ottomans.

Caltrops have a much less clear case.

Si
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”