Regaring to the list which Max wrote in page 24 of last AAR , I have to clear as follows :
1 The password bug was found before I opened Max turn . I just want to confirm whether this bug also effect our AAR , If not I would continue the AAR & just report the bug to the team , If it effect our AAR , I think the AAR will have to be halt .
2 I sent four emails to push him to play the double Allies-Axis game ,Because this is his proposal & it seems welcome in the forum & the game will be useful to test the 2.01.33 patch . He explained he had too many game to play ,but I maybe misunderstood he is barginning for me to continue the present AAR , so I suugest I declare he is winner of the AAR & we can continue . I just do not want to make the audience disappointed & do something useful to test the new patch for the team .
3 I never thought I am more important than the game .How is this point come from ?
4 No one told me what is the spirit of this game . If there is ,please advise me sothat I can obey . but It is not the first time I am beta tester , As I know that one of the resoponsibility of the beta tester is the exploit the game engine to find the weakness ,sothat the game team can fix it .Am I wrong ?
5 Yes I post part of our email content on the forum , The only reason is my limited English . I think the part is the same as I want to say on the forum,so I just copy & paste it .
I think the above points have nothing to do with my gamestyle & my behave ,I don’t mind I will be on whose list of what . One point which you are quite right “it is only a game !”
Morris 's reply regarding to the last AAR 1
Moderators: rkr1958, Happycat, Slitherine Core
@ Morris
The last AAR was one of the most enjoyable and this can be seen by the number of views that this recieved.
I do have some simpathy for your position - I do not believe there is any cheating or foul play at hand here - rather there is publicly posted comments which should be between Max and yourself.
I dont think despite the allegations that you are a bad person to play against and I think that this is something which should be privatly held comments.
There are a number of changes which will benefit the game as a whole which has come from your play. This has benefited the game in general.
I recently played a very frustrating game versus an opponant where I was Axis - I had a fairly normal start, accepting the French armistace - I defended in North Africa heavily with the Luftwaffe and this sucked his UK PP (along with a strong Italian Navy) - in Russia I ran full steam ahead suffered some reverses and then defended in winter outside the severe weather zone. My opponant used an almost exclusivly Mech blob against me, I learnt from the forums about the blobs and developed my own defence which resulted in the fact that in 44 when my opponant stopped playing - Finland had surrenderd but I still held Odessa, Sevastepol and the baltic countries. My manpower was around 90%, oil was 150 and Italy was still fully committed to the war. I would not have been as succesfull if not for seeing some of your tactics - I may have gotten steam rollered as most of your early opponents where.
So from my side when 2.1 is officially released I would be more than happy to play anyone. I love the game - in fact I think about it way to often than is healthy.
The only sad part about most of the AAR's is that they dont go to completion (baring a few exclusions). That said I dont have the time, inclination of ability to post an entertaining AAR so anything posted is gratefully recieved.
The last AAR was one of the most enjoyable and this can be seen by the number of views that this recieved.
I do have some simpathy for your position - I do not believe there is any cheating or foul play at hand here - rather there is publicly posted comments which should be between Max and yourself.
I dont think despite the allegations that you are a bad person to play against and I think that this is something which should be privatly held comments.
There are a number of changes which will benefit the game as a whole which has come from your play. This has benefited the game in general.
I recently played a very frustrating game versus an opponant where I was Axis - I had a fairly normal start, accepting the French armistace - I defended in North Africa heavily with the Luftwaffe and this sucked his UK PP (along with a strong Italian Navy) - in Russia I ran full steam ahead suffered some reverses and then defended in winter outside the severe weather zone. My opponant used an almost exclusivly Mech blob against me, I learnt from the forums about the blobs and developed my own defence which resulted in the fact that in 44 when my opponant stopped playing - Finland had surrenderd but I still held Odessa, Sevastepol and the baltic countries. My manpower was around 90%, oil was 150 and Italy was still fully committed to the war. I would not have been as succesfull if not for seeing some of your tactics - I may have gotten steam rollered as most of your early opponents where.
So from my side when 2.1 is officially released I would be more than happy to play anyone. I love the game - in fact I think about it way to often than is healthy.
The only sad part about most of the AAR's is that they dont go to completion (baring a few exclusions). That said I dont have the time, inclination of ability to post an entertaining AAR so anything posted is gratefully recieved.
Thanks for your attention ! BTW , Your situation in 1944 was much better than the Axis in the last AAR with Max . I do ignore the one who halt the game because he does not want to lose . Let's lookforward to the 2.1 's coming .afk_nero wrote:@ Morris
The last AAR was one of the most enjoyable and this can be seen by the number of views that this recieved.
I do have some simpathy for your position - I do not believe there is any cheating or foul play at hand here - rather there is publicly posted comments which should be between Max and yourself.
I dont think despite the allegations that you are a bad person to play against and I think that this is something which should be privatly held comments.
There are a number of changes which will benefit the game as a whole which has come from your play. This has benefited the game in general.
I recently played a very frustrating game versus an opponant where I was Axis - I had a fairly normal start, accepting the French armistace - I defended in North Africa heavily with the Luftwaffe and this sucked his UK PP (along with a strong Italian Navy) - in Russia I ran full steam ahead suffered some reverses and then defended in winter outside the severe weather zone. My opponant used an almost exclusivly Mech blob against me, I learnt from the forums about the blobs and developed my own defence which resulted in the fact that in 44 when my opponant stopped playing - Finland had surrenderd but I still held Odessa, Sevastepol and the baltic countries. My manpower was around 90%, oil was 150 and Italy was still fully committed to the war. I would not have been as succesfull if not for seeing some of your tactics - I may have gotten steam rollered as most of your early opponents where.
So from my side when 2.1 is officially released I would be more than happy to play anyone. I love the game - in fact I think about it way to often than is healthy.
The only sad part about most of the AAR's is that they dont go to completion (baring a few exclusions). That said I dont have the time, inclination of ability to post an entertaining AAR so anything posted is gratefully recieved.
