Intercept Charges

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

grahambriggs wrote:Let me see...

We have two dullards using boutique Roman armies trying to out cheese each other. No doubt for an upcoming competition.
I neither confirm nor deny this unfounded allegation.
One weasels an advantage, forgetting that his opponent will charge the flank next bound anyway.
Didn't forget at all. If one takes the time to look closely at where the troops will be following expanding to make overlaps and who will conform to who and such like it just might be the case that no flank charge is possible :). One of the things you notice about better players is they notice this sort of thing. Or to put another way, up yours Briggs.
Ruddock is bound to get a rule right eventually, since he throws out interpretations like confetti.
It's only that I am inevitably proved right after six months of discussion :P
Evaluator of Supremacy
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Post by titanu »

grahambriggs wrote:Let me see...We have two dullards using boutique Roman armies trying to out cheese each other. No doubt for an upcoming competition.
One weasels an advantage, forgetting that his opponent will charge the flank next bound anyway.
Ruddock is bound to get a rule right eventually, since he throws out interpretations like confetti.
Graham you are wrong:
I had REAL legionaries in mine so it was more upmarket chain store.
It was NOT two dullards it was a dullard and a dunderhead!!
There was no weaseling just squidging and squirming.
Ruddock does not throw rule interpretations out like........
Oh perhaps you are right after all!
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

petedalby wrote:From what I can see you did it correctly.

The yellow interceptor moves forward up to 2MU in an attempt to get between the blue charger and their intended target.

Looking at the distances involved, this would still appear to allow the blue charger to wheel to contact both the yellow interceptor and its declared target.

So the blue charge is not cancelled and IMO the middle unit (the one being charged by the blue shoulders) may not intercept as it is still the target of a charge.

Your scenario does highlight a wrinkle in the current intercept rules. Where the interceptor is on the flank, but is not in a legal flank charge position, it may not be able to get in the way to effectively intercept the charger.

Inevitably others will disagree :)
For an intercept to occur, the BG wishing to intercept must cross the path of the charger. If it can't there is no intercept.
The charger can never alter its charge path and direction in response to an intercept. It must proceed along the original path until it contacts the interceptor. In this case, as the charger is in a one base wide column, he halts on contact. There is no additional wheel. The initial target of the charge is a target at the beginning of the intercept phase and is ineligible to intercept.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
imanfasil
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by imanfasil »

gozerius wrote:
petedalby wrote:From what I can see you did it correctly.

The yellow interceptor moves forward up to 2MU in an attempt to get between the blue charger and their intended target.

Looking at the distances involved, this would still appear to allow the blue charger to wheel to contact both the yellow interceptor and its declared target.

So the blue charge is not cancelled and IMO the middle unit (the one being charged by the blue shoulders) may not intercept as it is still the target of a charge.

Your scenario does highlight a wrinkle in the current intercept rules. Where the interceptor is on the flank, but is not in a legal flank charge position, it may not be able to get in the way to effectively intercept the charger.

Inevitably others will disagree :)
For an intercept to occur, the BG wishing to intercept must cross the path of the charger. If it can't there is no intercept.
The charger can never alter its charge path and direction in response to an intercept. It must proceed along the original path until it contacts the interceptor. In this case, as the charger is in a one base wide column, he halts on contact. There is no additional wheel. The initial target of the charge is a target at the beginning of the intercept phase and is ineligible to intercept.
Gozerius is correct. If the BG cannot interpose itself into the charge path then it is not moved forward at all. The Charge path is declared ahead of interception charges, so if there is a way to declare the charge where it cannot be intercepted you can do that at the time of the charge, but it cannot be altered once the intercept has been declared.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3073
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

dave_r wrote:
grahambriggs wrote:Wind up
blah

And then they show their hand for such competition by posting their weaselings on t'internet :? so that all the other competitors can see what they're taking.

Wind up apart, one i didn't fancy the Roman period for Warfare as i suspect there'll be a lot of the boutique lot there. so I've gone into Dawn the Chav - no doubt that will be full of Italo Norman grit and air :roll:
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

grahambriggs wrote:so I've gone into Dawn the Chav - no doubt that will be full of Italo Norman grit and air :roll:
Must have missed that one. I thought it would be full of Spanish Muslims. More air, than Grit. What can Italo Normo's have?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Gordon conveniently posted his Italo Norman for everyone to see on one of the mailing lists. It didn't seem very airy. 3 BG of LF. Whereas those effete Fantastic Burpers get about 9 BG of LH and 6 BG of LF. If you see Cid tell him.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

Which goes to prove that the GB tournament scene is morally destructive to the hobby.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

hazelbark wrote:Which goes to prove that the GB tournament scene is morally destructive to the hobby.
But still miles better than the american one :p
Evaluator of Supremacy
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Post by titanu »

hazelbark wrote:Which goes to prove that the GB tournament scene is morally destructive to the hobby.
Americans preaching about morality? Isn't that like Herod preaching about child care?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

hazelbark wrote:Which goes to prove that the GB tournament scene is morally destructive to the hobby.
Gordon posting his list for all to see shows how morally superior the UK tournament scene is. Gordon knew noone would take advantage of seeing it.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”