1.62 disproportionate BG graphics

TheGrayMouser · Post by **TheGrayMouser** » Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:51 pm

Hmm, too many to list really, but pretty much all the Byzantine cavalry that have mixed BG's of lancer bows , the center graphic is very very much larger (or smaller) that the two flanking graphics. Also very noticable for units w a general. I would say the new cavalry graphics used with this expansion are 25% smaller then the other graphics reused ....

wellard2006 · Post by **wellard2006** » Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:13 am

I'm afraid I don't see that problem the images Mouser mentions all look in proportion to me.

Camels on the other hand look huge

amenofi64 · Post by **amenofi64** » Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:21 am

TheGrayMouser wrote:Hmm, too many to list really, but pretty much all the Byzantine cavalry that have mixed BG's of lancer bows , the center graphic is very very much larger (or smaller) that the two flanking graphics. Also very noticable for units w a general. I would say the new cavalry graphics used with this expansion are 25% smaller then the other graphics reused ....

For me too.

TheGrayMouser · Post by **TheGrayMouser** » Sun Oct 23, 2011 2:00 pm

wellard2006 wrote:I'm afraid I don't see that problem the images Mouser mentions all look in proportion to me.

Camels on the other hand look huge

Really!, load up a dag with say the Thematic Byzzies. The very Top unit to buy, look how tiny the graphics are relative too other cavalry units, and if you have a general with that unit the center figure is like twice the size!.

Camels do seem a little big too.

batesmotel · Post by **batesmotel** » Sun Oct 23, 2011 2:38 pm

For the Nikephorian Byzantines, the cavalry figure images are clearly smaller than either the kataphraktoi or the flanker horse archer images. The mixed images for the kataphraktoi are aout eqaully sized, but the commander figure mixed with cavalry is clearly out of proportion. I beleive the cavalry figures are legacy images from S&S Byzantine lists but the flankers and kataphratoi are new images which gibes with TGMs initial observations. The disproportionate sizes are definitely more noticeable in a rear view than the front do to differing styles of horse armour I suspect.

Chris

keithmartinsmith · Post by **keithmartinsmith** » Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:23 pm

If you can keep posting any incorrectly sized image details here that would be great but we will probably not fix any of these until we rebuild all the graphics as part of the final release build.
Thanks
Keith

wellard2006 · Post by **wellard2006** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:37 am

TheGrayMouser wrote:
wellard2006 wrote:I'm afraid I don't see that problem the images Mouser mentions all look in proportion to me.

Camels on the other hand look huge
Really!, load up a dag with say the Thematic Byzzies. The very Top unit to buy, look how tiny the graphics are relative too other cavalry units, and if you have a general with that unit the center figure is like twice the size!.

Camels do seem a little big too.

Ah I'm working through the army lists in order and only one or two a day so I hadn't got to the Thematics yet. my Observations were built on the Earlyarmy where everything seems fine though I did note that the Bucellari BGs with generals dont show a general figure.

1.62 disproportionate BG graphics

1.62 disproportionate BG graphics

Re: 1.62 disproportionate BG graphics