Fragged troops retiring (P114)

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
nosher
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:33 pm

Fragged troops retiring (P114)

Post by nosher »

In the Fragged box of the Cohesion Level and Effects Table on p114 the 3rd bullet point states that a unit may make a simple move to retire away from all enemy within 12MU.

I have scoured the pages but can't find anything on Retire elsewhere. :? How do retire moves work?

1. I am assuming that the BG in question 'retires' directly away from the nearest threat?

2. Am I right in thinking that if the BG is more than 6MU's from the enemy it can turn 180 and then second move directly away?

3. Am I right in thinking that if enemy are within 6MU's the unit may only turn 180 therefore presenting its rear as a juicy target?

or am I entirely wrong :lol:

Yours confusedly
Nosher
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Fragged troops retiring (P114)

Post by ravenflight »

nosher wrote:1. I am assuming that the BG in question 'retires' directly away from the nearest threat?
Well, there isn't really a 'retire' move, other than being an advance in the direction other than toward the enemy. It is use of English, not a description of a specific manoeuvre. So, you 'retire' by moving away from the enemy. You can't move 'closer' to the enemy without making a CMT... which is difficult enough but even harder for a fragged unit. So, basically a heavy foot BG (for example) would have to turn around one turn, and then move away from the enemy in the next turn (if they are still alive).
nosher wrote:2. Am I right in thinking that if the BG is more than 6MU's from the enemy it can turn 180 and then second move directly away?
I think so, so long as they pass the CMT. I don't have my rules handy, but I think you're right yes.
nosher wrote:3. Am I right in thinking that if enemy are within 6MU's the unit may only turn 180 therefore presenting its rear as a juicy target?
Well, that's one option... the other option would be to expose thy rear with some nice friends in between :lol:
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Post by bbotus »

nosher wrote:
2. Am I right in thinking that if the BG is more than 6MU's from the enemy it can turn 180 and then second move directly away?


I think so, so long as they pass the CMT. I don't have my rules handy, but I think you're right yes.
As long as the both moves start and stay more than 6MU's from the enemy and there is a commander with the unit (page 75, Second Moves).
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

The effects of fragmented actually says that a BG can make a simple move to retire away from all enemy within 12 MUs but must make a CMT for any other move.

Turning 180 or 90 would not be a simple move to retire away and would require a CMT if the training did not already require it.
Christopher Anders
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Post by bbotus »

Hmmm, this is getting interesting. Drilled troops would consider a 90 or 180 degree turn to be simple while stationary so that would be allowed without a CMT. The wording on page 114 'Fragmented', 3rd bullet, says , IMO, that to make a move closer to enemy, a fragmented unit would have to pass a CMT even if the type of move was considered a simple move for the fragmented unit.
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

bbotus wrote:Hmmm, this is getting interesting. Drilled troops would consider a 90 or 180 degree turn to be simple while stationary so that would be allowed without a CMT. The wording on page 114 'Fragmented', 3rd bullet, says , IMO, that to make a move closer to enemy, a fragmented unit would have to pass a CMT even if the type of move was considered a simple move for the fragmented unit.
The third bullet does not say anything about moving closer to the enemy. The 3rd bullet in its entirety says

Battle group can make a simple move to retire away from all enemy within 12 MUs but must CMT for any other move
Christopher Anders
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Post by bbotus »

berthier wrote:

The third bullet does not say anything about moving closer to the enemy. The 3rd bullet in its entirety says

Battle group can make a simple move to retire away from all enemy within 12 MUs but must CMT for any other move
Yes, exactly. So that says to me that if a fragmented group is making a simple move retiring away from all enemy within 12 MUs, no problem. But if they want to make a simple move not retiring but getting closer to enemy within 12 MUs then they must take a CMT. Do you read it differently?
imanfasil
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by imanfasil »

Yes - i think anything other than a move away from enemy requires a test. Like turning 90 in place... if drilled it would normally be simple, but if frag'd it would require a CMT.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

"must CMT for any other move" syas that if they do not move away it requires a CMT
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

imanfasil wrote:Yes - i think anything other than a move away from enemy requires a test. Like turning 90 in place... if drilled it would normally be simple, but if frag'd it would require a CMT.
A turn away can get you further away from the enemy depending on the depth of your bases.

why waste a general double moving fragged troops?
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

philqw78 wrote:"must CMT for any other move" syas that if they do not move away it requires a CMT
Are you saying that fragged troops who wish do nothing in the manoeuvre phase (i.e. remain precisely as they are) require to pass a CMT so to do?

In other words, they are obliged to move further away if they do not pass a CMT?

In other words "doing nothing" is a "move"?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

zoltan wrote:
philqw78 wrote:"must CMT for any other move" syas that if they do not move away it requires a CMT
Are you saying that fragged troops who wish do nothing in the manoeuvre phase (i.e. remain precisely as they are) require to pass a CMT so to do?

In other words, they are obliged to move further away if they do not pass a CMT?

In other words "doing nothing" is a "move"?
I thought I was supposed to be the facetious one
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”