RANT GOOD LUCK

pyrrhus · Post by **pyrrhus** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:07 pm

I have played several games and Have come to the conclusion that the russians should have made only this tank SU 100 .Its better than any german antitank and tank ,kills infantry with no problem has little or no vulnerabilitys its great really . However its not realistic, maybe the initiative is too high i dont know but wave after wave of these in late war is BORING. just as boring as never using the AT GUNS (pointless crap units) or having little or no use for pz IV's , stugs , hetzers (week armor dont know why) panzer jager IV short , Long 75s are poor but can do a little damage ,panthers are a joke only as good as t34/85 (not worth the points ). most german tanks suck except the giants and then the game turns into some version of ferdinand Porsche's Dream come true ,Yeah! . This game has some balance issues serious ones Great plate form but the old game had better balance IMHO The Attack ODDS are just terrible aswell .The AI is better but that is not saying much when the rest of the game isn't up to PAR ! You should have waited ,played more GOT FEED BACK!!!! and FINISHED IT ! sorry it was 3AM before coffee

rezaf · Post by **rezaf** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:13 pm

I'm having a hard time even determining what this post was all about (other than that it's a rant).
It's an inconsistent mess.

You should have waited, THOUGHT some more about what you WANT TO SAY!!!! and ONLY THEN POST !
_____
rezaf

VPaulus · Post by **VPaulus** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:18 pm

We all, have bad days... once in a while.

Post by **admin** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:51 pm

We're actually looking at the late war unit balance at the moment. I don't really understand your feedbck so if you could get it in to a more cohesive form it woudl be good to get your thoughts.

Inevitably all games have the early stages tested more thoroughly than the later stages. With the vast amounts of games now played we're in a better position to tweak the stats of the late war units to improve the situation so all feedback is welcome.

soldier · Post by **soldier** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:05 pm

I have played several games and Have come to the conclusion that the russians should have made only this tank

I'm guessing he means the IS 2 tank but who can tell

some fair points maybe

Fimconte · Post by **Fimconte** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:19 pm

He's talking about SU-100, it's a Soviet Anti-Tank unit.
Inferior to Elephant, so I'm not sure why he's complaining about it.

skarczew · Post by **skarczew** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:59 pm

He is disappointed with the balance in the game, apparently. IS-2, King Tiger, SU-100, etc -you have them, or you are dead.

Inferior to Elephant, so I'm not sure why he's complaining about it.

Being inferior to one unit does not mean that the game is balanced

.

Fimconte · Post by **Fimconte** » Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:26 pm

skarczew wrote:He is disappointed with the balance in the game, apparently. IS-2, King Tiger, SU-100, etc -you have them, or you are dead.
Inferior to Elephant, so I'm not sure why he's complaining about it.
Being inferior to one unit does not mean that the game is balanced .

It means he has a viable counter to SU-100 spam, so the game isn't unbalanced.

Molve · Post by **Molve** » Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:07 pm

Seven replies and no actual rant review?

(No, I'm kidding. Not really giving all tens to this rant - just that was the first pic of scoring judges I found)