Errata - are they required for these items in FoGR?

Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Errata - are they required for these items in FoGR?

Post by timmy1 »

I have started this thread to capture all the things that the authors need to consider for a FoG:R Errata when they create it (hopefully soon). There are questions in other threads that people are welcome to add here should they so choose (no intend to compell). I would ask people to look at the other threads I have opened for fequently asked questions and for typos that are non-material - if (like me) you enjoy nit-picking but the nits don't impact how the game is actually played - and see if they better belong there.

I have also pulled one or two items from other threads that don't clearly indicate errata in the title (e.g. Wars of Religion Companion 1 Errata).
Last edited by timmy1 on Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Early Tercio becoming a Late Tercio.

P32.

'If an early tercio ceases to have a shot base in each of the 4 horn positions...

*It functions thereafter for the remainder of the game as a later tercio. However, if it was initially deployed as a grand battle group ... it still counts as such if BROKEN, routed off table or destroyed.'

Why does it not count as a GBG if Fragmented?
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

timmy1 wrote:Early Tercio becoming a Late Tercio.

P32.

'If an early tercio ceases to have a shot base in each of the 4 horn positions...

*It functions thereafter for the remainder of the game as a later tercio. However, if it was initially deployed as a grand battle group ... it still counts as such if BROKEN, routed off table or destroyed.'

Why does it not count as a GBG if Fragmented?
Well, of course it does, one for the errata.

OTOH, the sentence is only explanatory. It clearly counts as a GBG anyway, because it started the game with more than 12 bases.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Richard is correct, I had posted this to the wrong thread. It is now in the correct thread. This can be deleted.
Last edited by timmy1 on Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

timmy1 wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote:
timmy1 wrote:The Early Thirty Years' War German Catholic Allies allows GC option in addition to FC/TC. It is the only list in Companion 1 that allows this. What is that meant to represent? Two ICs make for an interesting game.
A cut and paste error, sadly. As the points values indicate.
Tim,

Let's try to keep separate threads for rules errata and list errata. This is the thread for rules errata isn't it?
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Index Page 204, under Regimental gun markers there should be an additional reference to Page 117. (Mia Culpa)
Last edited by timmy1 on Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

-bit about 25mm scake and foot not being able to make it through artillery because of the 80mm depth...
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Again, Mia Cupla. Because I was late submitting the final corrections to the index, the below (material) items did not make it to the final printed version.

FoGR index errors pages 202-204
allied contingents remove 44
base removal remove 130
battle wagon remove 90
Charge: Responses replace 87 with 92
Charge: troops who cannot replace 52 with 82
Commander: lost replace 115 with 116
Commander: routing replace 143 with 144
Contraction replace 67 with 68
dismounting replace 128 with 178
Early Tercio replace 131 with 172
effective range replace 'See range' with 'See range, shooting'
extreme range replace 'See range' with 'See range, shooting'
Later Tercio remove 131 and 143 and replace with 132
Light Artillery remove 37
long range replace 'See range' with 'See range, shooting'
Obstacle add 142 and replace 127 with 170
Quality re-rolls: do not apply remove 128 and add 186
Regimental gun markers replace 129 with 120 and 112 with 152
riverbank replace 104 with 142
Second Move replace 56 with 61
short range replace 'See range' with 'See range, shooting'
two directions replace 'See fighting enemy in 2 directions' with 'See fighting in 2 or more directions'
replace '1 based width' with '1 base width'
2 directions replace 'See fighting enemy in 2 directions' with 'See fighting in 2 or more directions'
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

One thing I missed from the index, to be added before 'Complex move' on Page 203.

'
Commander-in-Chief see C-in-C
'

There should be an additional reference under 'C-in -C' to page 40. It is a non-bold reference.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

(By implication page 5)

Contents. Under BATTLE GROUPS. 'Other Miwed Formations' should read 'Other Mixed Formations'.

Not spotted by me.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”