An Apology

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:23 am

I would like to humbly apologise to anyone I may have upset on this forum over the years and to admit that I am usually, nay almost always wrong

gaesati · Post by **gaesati** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:35 am

What bet did you lose?

MatthewP · Post by **MatthewP** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:49 am

Can we make this a sticky, always at the top and maybe flashing red as well

grahambriggs · Post by **grahambriggs** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:55 am

He's only saying that he'd like to apologise, not that he is apologising.

Perhaps he doesn't know how?

david53 · Post by **david53** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:00 am

Well done Dave I never believed what they(Matt mostly) said about you

spike · Post by **spike** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:06 pm

david53 wrote:Well done Dave I never believed what they(Matt mostly) said about you

It's the body-snatchers will they please return the "real" Dave Ruddock!

shadowdragon · Post by **shadowdragon** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:31 pm

Dave,

You've not offended me; and I've always appreciated the deep insight into FoG that you have brought to the forum.

Paul

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:34 pm

Suspect his account has been hacked

kevinj · Post by **kevinj** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:42 pm

Suspect his account has been hacked

Surely anybody who hacked his account would have tried something more credible to start with...

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:42 pm

Kevin

That really made me laugh out loud - my wife gave me an odd look and asked what was so funny.

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:44 pm

If the next 46 posts are defending the indefensible and/or about odd defintions of evade rules we know it has not been hacked, else...

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:46 pm

I've sussed it! He is going to post one message to everyone he has upset, so overtaking Powell's count of posts...

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:45 pm

I didn't post that!

I suspect the work of a certain monsewer Hamilton is at work here.

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:05 pm

Having thought about it and looking at the time, it was almost certainly Powell.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:45 pm

dave_r · Post by **dave_r** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:53 pm

philqw78 wrote:

So it wasn't you then? I assumed it was because you had access to my PC at around that time on Friday morning.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:14 pm

How could you blame a fellow team member that had to share the hardship and then glory of Lisbon with you?

And anyway the fact that you may have been in the shower at the time of the alleged offence is just circumstantial, it won't stand up in court.

In fact I would put it to our honourable friends on this forum that you did indeed have a moment of conscience and did apologise after feeling the full force of guilt over what you have put them through.

But that wouldn't stand up in court either.

spike · Post by **spike** » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:48 am

dave_r wrote:I didn't post that!

I suspect the work of a certain monsewer Hamilton is at work here.

See........ I said it was the body-snatcher's at work

However it does not stop the truth of the statement that Dave "said" ......I am usually, nay almost always wrong.

( Phil could you not change his signature to "My name is Dave and everything I said is Bollocks" )