restricted zone

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
nagash
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

restricted zone

Post by nagash »

question on leaving the restricted zone, specifically for skirmishers on foot

skirmish units A and B are in each others restricted zone, right behind B is a unit of medium foot infantry (they are not in the restricted zone 2MU range).

unit B wants to retreat behind medium foot, however this takes them out of the restricted area of unit A, however the rule stats that they must be in front of the unit whose restricted zone they are within.

so can unit B perform this maneauver. I would think not but then it takes away the advantage that light foot have.

kalpesh
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

They can move out of the two inch restricted zone of another foot skirmisher but have to stay partially in front of the pinning unit.
Christopher Anders
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
nagash
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by nagash »

in essence unit B would still be in front of the medium infantry..thus preventing the medium infantry from charging.
imanfasil
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by imanfasil »

No. THey do not have to remain in front of the medium foot. They just need to stay in front of the LF unit... draw a straight line out front edges of A... B must end its move at least partially in that area.


| |
| |
AAA


It doesn't matter the distance or number of units between A and B as long as at least part of a base from unit B is within the area shown,

.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

So the answer is that B can pass completely through its freindly MF. All that is required is that some small part of B remain in front of a line extending A's restricted area forwards. It doesn't matter that this line passes through the MF.
cankre
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:56 pm

Post by cankre »

Sweet!! I thought that was weird. If they couldn't go through the infantry behind them, I would say that there was no use for LF screening NF or HF!

Note to self...more screens against Kal's ton's of shooting next week! LOL
nagash
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by nagash »

actually he is saying,,, you must have bases visible in your case, the MF were right behind the skirmishers, if they fled behind no base would be in the front of Unit A since they are all hiding behind MF. if the MF were off to the side(by a base) and you moved back then the skirmishes can get away, staying within my zone according the rules and you can charge with the MF
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Providing the BG in a restricted area ends its move partly in front of a base of the BG that restricted it there is no problem intepenetrating other BG and putting them between you and the enemy. So the LF can move through and behind other BG. No bases have to be 'visible' as you put it. There does not have to be a clear line of sight.

Only slightly related to this but, restricted area even passes through other enemy troops. So a BG of troops within 2MU of the front of enemy are restricted even if there are other troops between them
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
cankre
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:56 pm

Post by cankre »

Ahhh...gotcha! No problem. That is just a positioning thing. I will just have to be careful how I move up the unit behind!

Weird though. I wouldn't think it would matter. Skirmish screens retired behind mainline troops all through history.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

cankre wrote:Ahhh...gotcha! No problem. That is just a positioning thing. I will just have to be careful how I move up the unit behind!
It doesn't really matter how you move the unit behind LF. They can interpenetrate in any direction.
This is perfectly legal
Image
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
cankre
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:56 pm

Post by cankre »

I thought so!!!! The other way just didn't make sense to me.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

Phil's diagram sums it up nicely. Another scenario would be where your LF moved back into a wood or village etc. It doesn't matter that they can no longer be seen by the enemy who were exerting a restricted area. As long as you can draw the line (as shown by Phil) its ok.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”