ITC 2011 - Lisbon - 3/4 September
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Ghaznavid, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:18 pm
- Location: Portugal
Hi,blackbeard66 wrote:Hi,
So far we have only four people from abroad who stated their interest/availability to participate in this organized tour. We can wait until next Sunday 21st too see if we can make this viable. If not, we are working on a Plan B to happen Friday afternoon, which will not be dependant on a minimum number of participants.
Possibly with the added effect of the late announcement, we couldn't get enough interested people to make this tour viable this year. If the ITC remains in Portugal, we'll recover this idea for next year, with an earlier announcement and eventually a few extra ideas.
We are trying in this moment to get, for this year, a guided tour to the Museu Militar de Lisboa, as an alternative. We'll publish more details here as soon as we have confirmation, but once confirmed, the visit time will be during the afternoon of Friday 2nd, to enable a greater number of visitors to attend.
Fernando
-
- Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:18 pm
- Location: Portugal
Venue location
Hi,
I'm not sure if this subject was discussed here and if all players are aware of this.
The venue for the ITC 2011 in Lisboa, is NOT the same as in previous years.
This time the event will be run at Museu da Marinha, also situated in the Belém area. For those staying at Pensão Setubalense, this is nearer, only a 5 min walk.
If anyone has any doubts about the location of Museu da Marinha, please contact me or Joao Diogo.
Cheers,
Fernando
I'm not sure if this subject was discussed here and if all players are aware of this.
The venue for the ITC 2011 in Lisboa, is NOT the same as in previous years.
This time the event will be run at Museu da Marinha, also situated in the Belém area. For those staying at Pensão Setubalense, this is nearer, only a 5 min walk.
If anyone has any doubts about the location of Museu da Marinha, please contact me or Joao Diogo.
Cheers,
Fernando
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: Venue location
Toured it last year. Loved the first main room with some of the portuguese exploration in particular.blackbeard66 wrote: If anyone has any doubts about the location of Museu da Marinha, please contact me or Joao Diogo.
I was going to say that this was a rather poor attempt to fool your opponents into thinking you had a rubbish list, but then I remembered who it was that was postingbabyshark wrote:I will be very interested to see what the other Alexander Macedon players in Period 2 see as the optimal army configuration. For my part, I took an all-LF army (except for the mandatory Pikes, which I plan to send on a flank march each game).
Marc

Evaluator of Supremacy
The museum is very good but explaination signs are poor so a guide would help. It closes for 1 1/2 hors over lunch so beware.blackbeard66 wrote:We are trying in this moment to get, for this year, a guided tour to the Museu Militar de Lisboa, as an alternative. We'll publish more details here as soon as we have confirmation, but once confirmed, the visit time will be during the afternoon of Friday 2nd, to enable a greater number of visitors to attend.
Fernando
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
I waqs first to spot the mistake. It seems there are huge repurcussions, but I have made the same mistake myself with that list. I'm happy he takes it as is. Obviously the other players in the period would have to agree. Otherwise we all need to change our lists since a Bedouin that is not Hamdanids is a very different army to use so I'm sure Juan will not be happy.dave_r wrote:![]()
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Ruddock is already marking this down as one of the 732 reasons that Phil is to blame for what happens this weekend. Blame for loss or unsporting behavior if Phil out does Ruddock. That crafty ruddock is attacking from both directions.zoltan wrote:I have corrected Phil's pool 3 list range. He had an illegal range of 1050-1150 AD (pool 3 finishes in 1149 AD). Also, his was the only list that had a year range and not a specific year (potentially masking his possible troop selections) so I've called it 1149 AD.
Just turned him over in a practice tonight - 18-7 (or 3-0). AND he threw lucky dice.hazelbark wrote:Ruddock is already marking this down as one of the 732 reasons that Phil is to blame for what happens this weekend. Blame for loss or unsporting behavior if Phil out does Ruddock. That crafty ruddock is attacking from both directions.zoltan wrote:I have corrected Phil's pool 3 list range. He had an illegal range of 1050-1150 AD (pool 3 finishes in 1149 AD). Also, his was the only list that had a year range and not a specific year (potentially masking his possible troop selections) so I've called it 1149 AD.
Obviously the propoganda machine is carrying out preparatory ground work for any potential major embarassments.
Evaluator of Supremacy
I see that Dave is laying the ground work for some heavy whinging about his luck ready for the results to be posted!!dave_r wrote: ... AND he threw lucky dice.
If the old adage extended to gaming 'unlucky at cards, lucky in love' he would a have a string of 18 year old 'lady-boys' waiting at his door!
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8835
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Surely, if you want to be pedantic, since the allowed dates are "Dawn of Chivalry – 1050AD to 1149AD" a date of 1149 is also illegal. 1148 would be the latest allowable. But wargamers aren't pedantic, are they? (Much)zoltan wrote:I have corrected Phil's pool 3 list range. He had an illegal range of 1050-1150 AD (pool 3 finishes in 1149 AD). Also, his was the only list that had a year range and not a specific year (potentially masking his possible troop selections) so I've called it 1149 AD.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Pretty sure there's a legal convention that "to" is inclusive of. There may even have been a previous thread on this.philqw78 wrote:Surely, if you want to be pedantic, since the allowed dates are "Dawn of Chivalry – 1050AD to 1149AD" a date of 1149 is also illegal. 1148 would be the latest allowable. But wargamers aren't pedantic, are they? (Much)
I'm all for pedantry (or is that still illegal?).
;->)