It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refunddave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.
Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?
Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
terrain morality
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
LeslieMitchell
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 240
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:29 am
Re: terrain morality
Re: terrain morality
It's funny you should mention this, but I discussed this at length with said trader. He reckoned it might be a good business opportunity to "hire" terrain for a weekend or possibly on a game by game basis....LeslieMitchell wrote:It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refunddave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.
Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?
Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
Has this country completely gone to the dogs?
Evaluator of Supremacy
But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.shadowdragon wrote:But I thought "roads" were useless in FoGdave_r wrote:We all know this sort of behaviour would lead us down the road to ruin and towards GW.
Evaluator of Supremacy
Re: terrain morality
I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...LeslieMitchell wrote:It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refunddave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.
Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?
Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
-
Misericordia
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Yes the receipt for the Bosphoran army i sold you says. "Hot new competition army" sold to Dave R before he had ever actually played a tournament with Bosphorans. Witnessed by the Lord Chief Justice as well as the BHGS Politburo sub-committee on tournament tiger armies.dave_r wrote: Exactly my point - where will this behaviour end? I predict that in the future people may simply go out and buy the latest "hot" competition army ready painted and ready to use.
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: terrain morality
IIRC I had flown in and luggage had waylaid my terrain and i bought some at the thrift shop the night before. And some Boston lawyer who was about to be SPANKED in Austin complained that in my drunken scissoring the night before I had mis measured by 1/10th of an inch. So i lopped off a full inch to make said Boston litigator happy.iversonjm wrote: I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...
-
shadowdragon
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
Speaking of highly moral terrain....dave_r wrote:But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.shadowdragon wrote:But I thought "roads" were useless in FoGdave_r wrote:We all know this sort of behaviour would lead us down the road to ruin and towards GW.
Re: terrain morality
That's funny, I seem to recall you cutting the pieces down so they could fit in the available space...hazelbark wrote:IIRC I had flown in and luggage had waylaid my terrain and i bought some at the thrift shop the night before. And some Boston lawyer who was about to be SPANKED in Austin complained that in my drunken scissoring the night before I had mis measured by 1/10th of an inch. So i lopped off a full inch to make said Boston litigator happy.iversonjm wrote: I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...
I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).shadowdragon wrote:Speaking of highly moral terrain....dave_r wrote:But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.shadowdragon wrote: But I thought "roads" were useless in FoG...but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.
Evaluator of Supremacy
Ok, Put a Smilely on it so we can all join the funphilqw78 wrote:I think this thread is more about play ground name calling than anything else. Normal people need not worry about it Scot.
I'm surprised you he was able to find it in stock. The moral high ground was purchased long long ago in America.
"You've Been Sold Out" is all I can find over here.
Scot
-
shadowdragon
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
dave_r wrote:I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).shadowdragon wrote:Speaking of highly moral terrain....dave_r wrote: But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge....but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.
More to do will playing Dave than the lost terrain..shadowdragon wrote:dave_r wrote:I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).shadowdragon wrote: Speaking of highly moral terrain.......but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
shadowdragon
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
Re: terrain morality
Thank goodness I found this post. I was getting a bit worried that I had not hear Dave whinge about anything for over a week!dave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.
In the late period one of the players wandered over and bought his army at abot 5pm!!




