terrain morality

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

LeslieMitchell
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:29 am

Re: terrain morality

Post by LeslieMitchell »

dave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.

Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?

Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refund :twisted:
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

And at said tourney I believe that a player did turn up without his toys and have to purchase them from a trader just prior to the first game... but he was not first loser...
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: terrain morality

Post by dave_r »

LeslieMitchell wrote:
dave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.

Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?

Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refund :twisted:
It's funny you should mention this, but I discussed this at length with said trader. He reckoned it might be a good business opportunity to "hire" terrain for a weekend or possibly on a game by game basis....

Has this country completely gone to the dogs?
Evaluator of Supremacy
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

shadowdragon wrote:
dave_r wrote:We all know this sort of behaviour would lead us down the road to ruin and towards GW.
But I thought "roads" were useless in FoG
But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.
Evaluator of Supremacy
iversonjm
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: terrain morality

Post by iversonjm »

LeslieMitchell wrote:
dave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.

Is this legal? And more importantly is it morally acceptable?

Personally i think the player in question should have been drummed out of the tournament for this disgraceful display of unsporting behaviour.
It would only be morally unacceptable if he took it back after the game for a refund :twisted:
I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...
Misericordia
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by Misericordia »

Is it just me or is Dave's tongue planted firmly in his cheek? :wink:
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

dave_r wrote: Exactly my point - where will this behaviour end? I predict that in the future people may simply go out and buy the latest "hot" competition army ready painted and ready to use.
Yes the receipt for the Bosphoran army i sold you says. "Hot new competition army" sold to Dave R before he had ever actually played a tournament with Bosphorans. Witnessed by the Lord Chief Justice as well as the BHGS Politburo sub-committee on tournament tiger armies.
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: terrain morality

Post by hazelbark »

iversonjm wrote: I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...
IIRC I had flown in and luggage had waylaid my terrain and i bought some at the thrift shop the night before. And some Boston lawyer who was about to be SPANKED in Austin complained that in my drunken scissoring the night before I had mis measured by 1/10th of an inch. So i lopped off a full inch to make said Boston litigator happy.

8)
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

Misericordia wrote:Is it just me or is Dave's tongue planted firmly in his cheek? :wink:
His CHEEK if we are LUCKY.
shadowdragon
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada

Post by shadowdragon »

dave_r wrote:
shadowdragon wrote:
dave_r wrote:We all know this sort of behaviour would lead us down the road to ruin and towards GW.
But I thought "roads" were useless in FoG
But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.
Speaking of highly moral terrain.... :roll: ...but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
iversonjm
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: terrain morality

Post by iversonjm »

hazelbark wrote:
iversonjm wrote: I seem to recall an instance of Hazlebark cutting his terrain out of raw felt as we were rolling the dice...
IIRC I had flown in and luggage had waylaid my terrain and i bought some at the thrift shop the night before. And some Boston lawyer who was about to be SPANKED in Austin complained that in my drunken scissoring the night before I had mis measured by 1/10th of an inch. So i lopped off a full inch to make said Boston litigator happy.

8)
That's funny, I seem to recall you cutting the pieces down so they could fit in the available space...
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

shadowdragon wrote:
dave_r wrote:
shadowdragon wrote: But I thought "roads" were useless in FoG
But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.
Speaking of highly moral terrain.... :roll: ...but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).

One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.
Evaluator of Supremacy
ScotGore
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:06 pm

Post by ScotGore »

philqw78 wrote:I think this thread is more about play ground name calling than anything else. Normal people need not worry about it Scot.
Ok, Put a Smilely on it so we can all join the fun :D

I'm surprised you he was able to find it in stock. The moral high ground was purchased long long ago in America.

"You've Been Sold Out" is all I can find over here.

:wink:

Scot
shadowdragon
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada

Post by shadowdragon »

dave_r wrote:
shadowdragon wrote:
dave_r wrote: But roads are exceptionally useful in FoG. Especially when you put them down first hence blocking off one side edge.
Speaking of highly moral terrain.... :roll: ...but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).

One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

shadowdragon wrote:
dave_r wrote:
shadowdragon wrote: Speaking of highly moral terrain.... :roll: ...but nonetheless legitimate with the RAW.
I believe it is a highly historical instance to put a river and road down both flanks of the Battlefield. A historical tactic that I followed in every one of my games that I had PBI (five out of six I think).

One of my opponents lost all four of his terrain pieces. I believe he may even have said a bad word.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
More to do will playing Dave than the lost terrain.. :) :) :)
shadowdragon
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada

Post by shadowdragon »

philqw78 wrote:
timurilenk wrote:That is nearly how it happened Phil
Why let the truth stand in the way of a good story
You know, Phil, I just realized...this isn't the first time you've been the Elefant in the room, is it?
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Re: terrain morality

Post by titanu »

dave_r wrote:In a (very) recent game we had just determined which side had gained the pre battle iniative, at which point my opponent wandered over to a terrain stand and bought some terrain specifically for the game.
Thank goodness I found this post. I was getting a bit worried that I had not hear Dave whinge about anything for over a week!
In the late period one of the players wandered over and bought his army at abot 5pm!!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”