Mid Republican Roman Fortified Camp

BrotherCrow · Post by **BrotherCrow** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:02 am

Just a quick question - is the Mid Republican Roman Fortified Camp compulsory at all times, or is it only when downgrading the legionaries to poor...I don't think it's clear, as the fortified camp is under the "downgrade" heading", and not under the regular/upgrade headings.

I've been doing it at all times, but on looking at the list, I'm not so sure...

G.

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:20 am

All the time.

BrotherCrow · Post by **BrotherCrow** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:35 am

Cheers Nick, that's how I'd been playing it. I think it should be moved up a bit in the list though, so it appears in "core troops", rather than "upgrades/downgrades"...

...and it's still a waste of 24 points...!!!

G.

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:11 pm

Don't agree it is a waste of points. Phil and Nik have demonstrated how it can be used as an effective pivot or hinge when you have a much smaller army than your opponent.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:36 pm

Its easier to get 7 BG of cavalry around the hinge. 7 BG of legions is a big ask in 3 hours.

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:34 am

True.

Luddite · Post by **Luddite** » Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:44 pm

Just out of interest, why is the fortified camp compulsory?

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:22 pm

The rules authors hate Romans...?

jlopez · Post by **jlopez** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:47 am

Luddite wrote:Just out of interest, why is the fortified camp compulsory?

Because the Roman army of that period routinely built fortified camps at the end of each day's march when on campaign. They only varied in the depth of the ditch and height of bank depending on the level of threat.

Fluffy · Post by **Fluffy** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:11 pm

timmy1 wrote:The rules authors hate Romans...?

What's wrong with that?

Mehrunes · Post by **Mehrunes** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Just play Early Republican Romans with the same miniatures. They don't have to take the camp fortified...

jonphilp · Post by **jonphilp** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:43 pm

The topic of fortified camps has been raised before. Hopefully it will be addressed in v2. In my view Roman fortified camps should have the additional capability of incorporating the Roman legions light artillery for the points to give it a "zone of control", as its main function of being a last bastion in the face of defeat is not available as you can not occcupy a fortified camp with a battlegroup.

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:18 pm

'cos I likes Romans...?

Luddite · Post by **Luddite** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:58 pm

jlopez wrote:
Luddite wrote:Just out of interest, why is the fortified camp compulsory?
Because the Roman army of that period routinely built fortified camps at the end of each day's march when on campaign. They only varied in the depth of the ditch and height of bank depending on the level of threat.

But they aren't the only army that 'routinely built fortified camps', yet as far as i can see there are almost no other armies that have this as compulsory. Just curious why they've been singled out.

ScotGore · Post by **ScotGore** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:17 pm

timmy1 wrote:The rules authors hate Romans...?

Oh Yeah.....feel the hate

HF Armoured Superior Drilled - Impact Foot Skilled swordmen

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:06 am

timmy1 wrote:The rules authors hate Romans...?

Oh yeah, how much. If you want to join the PFJ you've got to really hate the Romans.

Vespasian28 · Post by **Vespasian28** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:07 pm

After all, what have the Romans ever done for us?