Protection and Overlap

Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Protection and Overlap

Post by timmy1 »

Page 119. In the example 'Troops eligible to fight in melee' file 'X' "can fight as an overlap". However Page 112 final bullet states "A file that can contribute to close combat to its front ... by creating a Point of Advantage (PoA) or denying the enemy a PoA, cannot fight as an overlap". As file 'X' is part of giving protection to the musketeer files adjacent to 'X', by a strict reading they can't be fighting as overlap (unless overlap does not count as 'close combat to its front'). I believe that the intent is that they can count as overlap and I have always played, and seen it played, that way but I realise it could be read that they don't.
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

Except, as I see it, X is not able to "contribute to close combat to its front." So it is eligible to fight as an overlap.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

B

Thanks, that it good. I hope you are right (for the game's sake)

However I have looked and can't see where that phrase is defined (I have a vague recollection of reading it but can't pin it down). Do you have any pointers?
Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut »

I don't think I have ever seen 'close combat to front' defined. It seems fairly clear.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

I believe unless you are in front base to base contact with an enemy base you are not in melee, so standing beside a base that is in base contact with an enemy base allows you to become an overlap.
I am pretty sure the only restrictions are are you adding POA's or dice to the combat, if you are you can't count as an overlap. I don't think giving protection would exclude you from being an overlap.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

deadtorius wrote:I believe unless you are in front base to base contact with an enemy base you are not in melee, so standing beside a base that is in base contact with an enemy base allows you to become an overlap.
I am pretty sure the only restrictions are are you adding POA's or dice to the combat, if you are you can't count as an overlap. I don't think giving protection would exclude you from being an overlap.
Of course it doesn't. Tim is just being Tim, and has been out-rule-lawyered by Blathergut.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Richard

As written it does, sadly. I hoped that somewhere 'close combat to front' was defined to remove my concern. However now you have confirmed that my reading is wrong I will continue to play it they way it is confirmed in this thread.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

timmy1 wrote:As written it does, sadly.
Well we will have to agree to disagree on that point. However, as your reading appears to be in a minority of one, I don't think we really have an issue here.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”