Aircraft Carriers

PC : Turn based WW2 goodness in the mold of Panzer General. This promises to be a true classic!

Moderators: Slitherine Core, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design

Post Reply
yoshyusmc
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:47 pm

Aircraft Carriers

Post by yoshyusmc »

I am at a lost as to what good are aircraft carriers for?

They obviously have no attack value, and I am at a lost as to how to have a fighter land on them. And if it to just be used as another airfield, where are the dive bombers in the Hunt in the Atlantic scenario?


As it is, fighters are not great at bombing naval targets.
VPaulus
Slitherine
Slitherine
Posts: 8324
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:33 pm
Location: Portugal

Post by VPaulus »

Page 21:
Carriers serve as mobile airfields that can resupply fighters and tactical bombers. This makes them useful for naval invasions where land-based airfields are not available or are too far away from the action. Note however that a plane needs
to be directly above the carrier to be supplied so only one unit a turn can be supplied, and strategic bombers cannot be resupplied by carriers. Carriers have no combat stats themselves and need escorts to protect them from enemy attacks.
Against naval targets, use strategic bombers instead of fighters.
yoshyusmc
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:47 pm

Post by yoshyusmc »

VPaulus wrote:Page 21:
Carriers serve as mobile airfields that can resupply fighters and tactical bombers. This makes them useful for naval invasions where land-based airfields are not available or are too far away from the action. Note however that a plane needs
to be directly above the carrier to be supplied so only one unit a turn can be supplied, and strategic bombers cannot be resupplied by carriers. Carriers have no combat stats themselves and need escorts to protect them from enemy attacks.
Against naval targets, use strategic bombers instead of fighters.
Yes the Strat Bombers are the best, but shouldn't the Carrier be?
Kerensky
Content Designer
Content Designer
Posts: 8624
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:12 am

Post by Kerensky »

With specific regards to Hunters in the Atlantic...

The game isn't meant to be decided by air power. And even if there were more significant air assets (British have 2 fighters, 2 level bombers, 1 tactical bomber, and prestige for 1 more air unit) the weather in that scenario is predominately cloudy or raining. Air forces in that scenario are mostly peripheral and useful as scouts.

The aircraft carrier's true use in that scenario is it's extraordinary sight radius. Like the German U-boats, the aircraft carrier has a 3 spotting radius, making it the best British Naval unit to use in a 'scouting' role. Sinking Bismark and Tirpitz on that scenario is only half the battle, you have to find them first! ;)
yoshyusmc
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:47 pm

Post by yoshyusmc »

Kerensky wrote:With specific regards to Hunters in the Atlantic...

The game isn't meant to be decided by air power. And even if there were more significant air assets (British have 2 fighters, 2 level bombers, 1 tactical bomber, and prestige for 1 more air unit) the weather in that scenario is predominately cloudy or raining. Air forces in that scenario are mostly peripheral and useful as scouts.

The aircraft carrier's true use in that scenario is it's extraordinary sight radius. Like the German U-boats, the aircraft carrier has a 3 spotting radius, making it the best British Naval unit to use in a 'scouting' role. Sinking Bismark and Tirpitz on that scenario is only half the battle, you have to find them first! ;)
Ok, well noted.

Actually during clear days, my bombers slammed the Germans really hard, and helped sink the Tirpitz.
Kerensky
Content Designer
Content Designer
Posts: 8624
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:12 am

Post by Kerensky »

Peripheral doesn't mean useless! :D
Xerkis
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: Northeast, USA

Post by Xerkis »

Shouldn't only certain aircraft be allowed to use a carrier? I don't think some of those big bombers could land on one.... Just a thought.
Rudankort
FlashBack Games
FlashBack Games
Posts: 3836
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:23 pm
Contact:

Post by Rudankort »

Xerkis wrote:Shouldn't only certain aircraft be allowed to use a carrier? I don't think some of those big bombers could land on one.... Just a thought.
Strategic bombers cannot use carriers, only tacs and fighters can.
Xerkis
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: Northeast, USA

Post by Xerkis »

Rudankort wrote:
Xerkis wrote:Shouldn't only certain aircraft be allowed to use a carrier? I don't think some of those big bombers could land on one.... Just a thought.
Strategic bombers cannot use carriers, only tacs and fighters can.
Every day I keep finding out how truly awesome this game is.
:)
Post Reply

Return to “Panzer Corps”