Ambush - should it always be so
Moderators: Slitherine Core, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design
Ambush - should it always be so
If a unit is not entrenched and only moved the previous turn perhaps this should be a meeting engagement and not an ambush? Also I think SCouting would have been much much better IRL so perhaps fog of war should allow greater spotting ability?
But how realistic is it that an advancing army always gets ambushed?Razz1 wrote:Ambush works good now. Higher visibility units like recon at 4 were considered and may change in the future if members feels there is a need for it.
I was thinking for Germany.. 222 = sight 4 as it's movement range is less and has wheels so mountain and hills and forest affect movement allot.
Rudankort wrote:Well how realistic is it that an army is advancing without proper recon?flickjax wrote:But how realistic is it that an advancing army always gets ambushed?
Don't get me wrong I think the game is really good, but things like scouting should be taken for granted to an extent I think. Yes Ambushes for long distance travel but perhaps on the shorter advances general scouting should meen more meeting engagements?
-
- Panzer Corps Moderator
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 am
Ambushes are not much of an issue for a strong unit. In fact, they are a good way to get a tank or other strong unit to get 2 attacks in a turn: attack once then intentionally run into an ambush for a weakened enemy unit. Chances are the weakened enemy unit will be destroyed. Of course, that will use 2 rounds of ammo but may be worth it in some cases. Learned that one from Kerensky. Kudos.