Late Republican Roman List - looking for inspiration

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
jhedwards007
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:57 pm

Late Republican Roman List - looking for inspiration

Post by jhedwards007 »

Hi all,
have a few games comming up using my LRR army @ 800 points. was wondering if anyone could vouch a few ideas for army list composition other than taking legions, legions and more legions.

Opponents i'm likely to face include spear/pike armies and also light horse with cataphracts from imortal fire/rise of rome list.

cheers
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

What figure scale are you fighting at. It makes a considerable difference.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
jhedwards007
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:57 pm

Post by jhedwards007 »

15mm figure scale to 800 points :)
current army is bascially
3 x tc's
6 x 4 sup arm legionaries
2 x 4 lh j/lsp
2 x 4 cav arm sup sp/sw
1 x 6 mf impact sword
1 x 6 mf offensive spear
1 x fortified camp

a smattering of lf to make up the points - normally 2 bgs of archers and 1 bg of slingers
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

I would think about the Brutus option, add some LH Bw to delay a flank (possibly dropping the Lt Sp LH), certainly not to fight unless at a big advantage, but not the MF Bow. Also I would take the Thracian MF as your opponents get a lot of armour.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
jhedwards007
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:57 pm

Post by jhedwards007 »

any disadvantages that heavy weapon medium foot get in the rough so to speak against other armed troops?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Skilled sword armoured heavy foot would still be at a single plus, but less dice.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Something people often forget is how good "impact" heavy foot are in rough against other foot. They may lose 1 dice per three, but are a POA up against spear at impact and the Romans being superior and armoured makes them very good. Their problem is being so slow moving in there.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

jhedwards007 wrote:any disadvantages that heavy weapon medium foot get in the rough so to speak against other armed troops?
Not really - they get the same points of advantage and number of dice as they do in the open. And often their opponents lose dice or POAs. As Phil says, "proper" legions (IF, SSw) still have a POA advantage in rough against HW MF but:

- the legion will have less dice, and
- if the HW boys lose in the melee they don't get a -1 for MF losing to HF as they are not in the open (though at impact they still get a -1 if they lose to impact foot).
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”