Portuguese army probably was better than the FOGR list and of asian armies but HIMO not as good as superior grading will suggest.pippohispano wrote:Oh, really???Aryaman wrote:There are other sieges with other sources that tell different stories about Portuguese performance, for instance in 1552 Piri Reis captured Muscat with just 850 men, and in 1622 a force of 5 armed merchants of the East Indian Company and 4.000 Persian infantry took Ormuz, defended by 1.000 Portuguese that surrendered after only a light resistance.
In all, I think we shouldn´t make Colonial Portuguese superior just because their self perceived superior performance in some battles![]()
So, because the Portuguese lost battles they shouldn’t be superior… I see...
In others list for this period there are few superior troop even in Europe , I don think that Portuguese army was better than other european counterpart (in that case Portuguese army had conquered europe and not brasil)




