“Ist FoG Challenger’s Tournament - Swords & Scimitars Sc

Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft

Post Reply
claymore58
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by claymore58 »

Group 7 results:

claymore (Khwarazmians) 30/43 WIN - Xiccarph (Kara Khanids) 48/43

That makes one win each
claymore58
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by claymore58 »

claymore wrote:Group 7 results:

claymore (Khwarazmians) 30/43 WIN - Xiccarph (Kara Khanids) 48/43

That makes one win each
sorry, the previous one as a win for mr carph
claymore (Kara Khanids) 45/43 LOSS - Xiccarph (Khwarazmians) 25/43

Cheers, Claymore
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

With the result of the game between claymore and Xiccarph the first preliminary phase has ended and we can now start the next round at full speed!

Thank's to all the participants that were eliminated, hoping they had anyway some nice games!
The bid for glory will continue in the next edition of the Tournament! :D

Here are the final standings of the 1st phase:


Ist Preliminary Round

Group 1
pantherboy (Bulgarians) 21/43 - dazzam (Serbians) 55/50
pantherboy (Serbians) 12/50 - dazzam (Bulgarians) 46/43
dazzam (Khwarazmians) 44/43 - CheAhn (Kara Khanids) 18/43
dazzam (Kara Khanids) 48/43 - CheAhn (Khwarazmians) 27/43
CheAhn (Fatimids) 55/49 – pantherboy (Crusaders) 20/46
CheAhn (Crusaders) 48/46 – pantherboy (Fatimids) 49/49
Standings
15 pts. pantherboy (+102)
9 pts. CheAhn (+13)
0 pts. dazzam (-115)
Qualified
pantherboy (A1), CheAhn (A2)


Group 2
hidde (Bulgarians) 40/43 - TheGrayMouser (Serbians) 45/43
hidde (Serbians) 26/50 - TheGrayMouser (Bulgarians) 45/43
TheGrayMouser (Khwarazmians) 39/43 - deadtorius (Kara Khanids) 45/43
TheGrayMouser (Kara Khanids) 45/43 - deadtorius (Khwarazmians) 26/43
deadtorius (Crusaders) 57/46 - hidde (Fatimids) 19/49
deadtorius (Fatimids) 53/49 - hidde (Crusaders) 16/46
Standings
16 pts. hidde (+106)
5 pts. deadtorius (-62)
3 pts. TheGrayMouser (-44)
Qualified
hidde (B1), deadtorius (B2)


Group 3
Morbio (Serbians) 34/50 - Triarius (Bulgarians) 47/43
Morbio (Bulgarians) 28/43 - Triarius (Serbians) 52/50
Triarius (Khwarazmians) 41/43 – petran1978 (Kara Khanids) 45/43
Triarius (Kara Khanids) 25/43 – petran1978 (Khwarazmians) 48/43
petran1978 (Fatimids) 49/49 - Morbio (Crusaders) 44/46
petran1978 (Crusaders) 46/46 - Morbio (Fatimids) 26/49
Standings
16 pts. Morbio (+62)
8 pts. Triarius (-10)
0 pts. petran1978 (-52)
Qualified
Morbio (C1), Triarius (C2)


Group 4
davouthojo (Bulgarians) 25/43 – tofman04 (Serbians) 53/50
davouthojo (Serbians) 26/50 – tofman04 (Bulgarians) 44/43
tofman04 (Khwarazmians) 43/43 - MesaDon (Kara Khanids) 39/43
tofman04 (Kara Khanids) 43/43 - MesaDon (Khwarazmians) 43/43
MesaDon (Crusaders) 50/46 - davouthojo (Fatimids) 39/49
MesaDon (Fatimids) 53/49 - davouthojo (Crusaders) 10/46
Standings
16 pts. davouthojo (+100)
7 pts. MesaDon (-50)
1 pts. tofman04 (-50)
Qualified
davouthojo (D1), MesaDon (D2)


Group 5
Lysimachos (Bulgarians) 40/43 - iandavidsmith (Serbians) 50/50
Lysimachos (Serbians) 22/50 - iandavidsmith (Bulgarians) 48/43
iandavidsmith (Kara Khanids) 29/43 - jimcdaw (Khwarazmians) 46/43
iandavidsmith (Khwarazmians) 40/43 - jimcdaw (Kara Khanids) 45/43
jimcdaw (Fatimids) 60/49 - Lysimachos (Crusaders) 27/46
jimcdaw (Crusaders) 47/46 - Lysimachos (Fatimids) 7/49
Standings
16 pts. Lysimachos (+109)
8 pts. iandavidsmith (-14)
0 pts. jimcdaw (-95)
Qualified
Lysimachos (E1), iandavidsmith (E2)


Group 6
deeter (Serbians) 17/50 – rom1944 (Bulgarians) 45/43
deeter (Bulgarians) 27/43 – rom1944 (Serbians) 52/50
rom1944 (Kara Khanids) - gazxtrix (Khwarazmians) DRAW
rom1944 (Khwarazmians) - gazxtrix (Kara Khanids) GAZXTRIX WIN
gazxtrix (Fatimids) - deeter (Crusaders) WIN DEETER
gazxtrix (Crusaders) - deeter (Fatimids) WIN DEETER
Standings
16 pts. deeter (+53)
7 pts. gazxtrix
1 pts. rom1944 (-53)
Qualified
deeter (F1), gazxtrix (F2)


Group 7
ianiow (Bulgarians) 44/43 - claymore (Serbians) 29/50
ianiow (Serbians) 55/50 - claymore (Bulgarians) 22/43
claymore (Kara Khanids) 45/43 - Xiccarph (Khwarazmians) 25/43
claymore (Khwarazmians) 30/43 - Xiccarph (Kara Khanids) 48/43
Xiccarph (Fatimids) 30/49 - ianiow (Crusaders) 47/46
Xiccarph (Crusaders) 48/46 - ianiow (Fatimids) 54/49
Standings
12 pts. Xiccarph (+25)
11 pts. claymore (+44)
1 pts. ianiow (-69)
Qualified
Xiccarph (G1), claymore (G2)


Group 8
batesmotel (Bulgarians) 31/43 - petergarnett (Serbians) 51/50
batesmotel (Serbians) 37/50 - petergarnett (Bulgarians) 43/43
petergarnett (Kara Khanids) 26/43 - Archie (Khwarazmians) 45/43
petergarnett (Khwarazmians) 23/43 - Archie (Kara Khanids) 43/43
Archie (Fatimids) 57/49 - batesmotel (Crusaders) 18/46
Archie (Crusaders) 47/46 - batesmotel (Fatimids) 47/49
Standings
16 pts. batesmotel (+65)
8 pts. petergarnett (+13)
0 pts. Archie (-78 )
Qualified
batesmotel (H1), petergarnett (H2)
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

And here is the schedule of the 2nd round.

IInd Preliminary Round


Group 9
pantherboy (Cumans) - Triarius (Georgians)
pantherboy (Georgians) - Triarius (Cumans)
hidde (Cumans) – MesaDon (Georgians)
hidde (Georgians) – MesaDon (Cumans)
Triarius (Abbasids) – hidde (Zangids)
Triarius (Zangids) – hidde (Abbasids)
MesaDon (Abbasids) – pantherboy (Zangids)
MesaDon (Zangids) – pantherboy (Abbasids)
pantherboy (Seljuk Turks) – hidde (Armenians)
pantherboy (Armenians) – hidde (Seljuk Turks)
Triarius (Seljuk Turks) – MesaDon (Armenians)
Triarius (Armenians) – MesaDon(Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified


Group 10
Morbio (Cumans) – CheAhn (Georgians)
Morbio (Georgians) – CheAhn (Cumans)
davouthojo (Cumans) – deadtorius (Georgians)
davouthojo (Georgians) – deadtorius (Cumans)
CheAhn (Abbasids) – davouthojo (Zangids)
CheAhn (Zangids) – davouthojo (Abbasids)
deadtorius (Abbasids) – Morbio (Zangids)
deadtorius (Zangids) – Morbio (Abbasids)
Morbio (Seljuk Turks) – davouthojo (Armenians)
Morbio (Armenians) – davouthojo(Seljuk Turks)
CheAhn (Seljuk Turks) – deadtorius (Armenians)
CheAhn (Armenians) – deadtorius (Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified


Group 11
Lysimachos (Cumans) – claymore (Georgians)
Lysimachos (Georgians) – claymore (Cumans)
deeter (Cumans) – petergarnett (Georgians)
deeter (Georgians) – petergarnett (Cumans)
claymore (Abbasids) – deeter (Zangids)
claymore (Zangids) – deeter (Abbasids)
petergarnett (Abbasids) – Lysimachos (Zangids)
petergarnett (Zangids) – Lysimachos (Abbasids)
Lysimachos (Seljuk Turks) – deeter (Armenians)
Lysimachos (Armenians) – deeter (Seljuk Turks)
claymore (Seljuk Turks) – petergarnett (Armenians)
claymore (Armenians) – petergarnett (Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified


Group 12
Xiccarph (Cumans) – iandavidsmith (Georgians)
Xiccarph (Georgians) – iandavidsmith (Cumans)
batesmotel (Cumans) – gazxtrix (Georgians)
batesmotel (Georgians) – gazxtrix (Cumans)
iandavidsmith (Abbasids) – batesmotel (Zangids)
iandavidsmith (Zangids) – batesmotel (Abbasids)
gazxtrix (Abbasids) – Xiccarph (Zangids)
gazxtrix (Zangids) – Xiccarph (Abbasids)
Xiccarph (Seljuk Turks) – batesmotel (Armenians)
Xiccarph (Armenians) – batesmotel (Seljuk Turks)
iandavidsmith (Seljuk Turks) – gazxtrix (Armenians)
iandavidsmith (Armenians) – gazxtrix (Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified

Everybody is now free to launch the new challenges! :P
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Seljuk Turk vs Armenian problem

Post by batesmotel »

This scenario seems to have the sides assigned incorrectly so each player's routers are routing to the opponent's starting edge. The game also comes up with the current players troops on the top of the map rather than the bottom.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

This scenario seems to have the sides assigned incorrectly so each player's routers are routing to the opponent's starting edge. The game also comes up with the current players troops on the top of the map rather than the bottom.

Chris
You're right Chris.
I've solved the problem but at the moment I'm not able to upload the revised version being away and having some problems in working with Mediafire.
When I'll be back on wednesday I'll immediately do it.
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
Morbio
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2164
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
Location: Wokingham, UK

Post by Morbio »

Results so far:

Morbio Abbasids 16/47 v Deadtorius Zangids 46/44

Morbio Zangids 45/44 v Deadtorius Abbasids 41/47


A good pair of matches with the second one going to the wire. In this one Abbasids clawed back an early deficit while the Zangids ran out of steam and the foot soldiers were surrounded and slaughtered.
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

Group 12

batesmotel (Seljuk Turks) 40/40 - Xiccarph (Armenians) 38/50
batesmotel (Armenians) 26/50 - Xiccarph (Seljuk Turks) 41/40

Two good games with another good scenario although the terrain plus the higher AP seem to favor the Armenians a bit.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
iandavidsmith
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1379
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:56 am

SAS FoG Challenge Round 2

Post by iandavidsmith »

Group 12

iandavidsmith (Seljuk Turks) 15/40 – gazxtrix (Armenians) 20/50 RESIGN
iandavidsmith (Armenians) 9/50 – gazxtrix (Seljuk Turks) 5/40 RESIGN

Unfortunately gazxtrix had to resign on both games
because of going away .

Thanks
Ian
CheAhn
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 356
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:44 am

Post by CheAhn »

Group 10

CheAhn (Georgians) 33/50 - Morbio (Cumans) 52/47
CheAhn (Cumans) 47/47 - Morbio (Georgians) 49/50


One each.


Cheers
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

Hi all!

Here's the link where downloading the revised and corrected version of the Armenians vs Seljuk Turks scenario:
http://www.mediafire.com/?2a80ogzxw47bt9p

Please note everybody that the right version with wich fighting the 3rd match of the round is this one.
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

This is the actual situation:

IInd Preliminary Round


Group 9
pantherboy (Cumans) - Triarius (Georgians)
pantherboy (Georgians) - Triarius (Cumans)
hidde (Cumans) – MesaDon (Georgians)
hidde (Georgians) – MesaDon (Cumans)
Triarius (Abbasids) – hidde (Zangids)
Triarius (Zangids) – hidde (Abbasids)
MesaDon (Abbasids) – pantherboy (Zangids)
MesaDon (Zangids) – pantherboy (Abbasids)
pantherboy (Seljuk Turks) – hidde (Armenians)
pantherboy (Armenians) – hidde (Seljuk Turks)
Triarius (Seljuk Turks) – MesaDon (Armenians)
Triarius (Armenians) – MesaDon(Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified


Group 10
Morbio (Cumans) 52/47 – CheAhn (Georgians) 33/50
Morbio (Georgians) 49/50 – CheAhn (Cumans) 47/47
davouthojo (Cumans) – deadtorius (Georgians)
davouthojo (Georgians) – deadtorius (Cumans)
CheAhn (Abbasids) – davouthojo (Zangids)
CheAhn (Zangids) – davouthojo (Abbasids)
deadtorius (Abbasids) 41/47 – Morbio (Zangids) 45/44
deadtorius (Zangids) 46/44 – Morbio (Abbasids) 16/47
Morbio (Seljuk Turks) – davouthojo (Armenians)
Morbio (Armenians) – davouthojo(Seljuk Turks)
CheAhn (Seljuk Turks) – deadtorius (Armenians)
CheAhn (Armenians) – deadtorius (Seljuk Turks)
Standings
8 pts. Morbio (+5)
5 pts. CheAhn (+21)
3 pts. deadtorius (-26)
= pts. davouthojo
Qualified


Group 11
Lysimachos (Cumans) – claymore (Georgians)
Lysimachos (Georgians) – claymore (Cumans)
deeter (Cumans) – petergarnett (Georgians)
deeter (Georgians) – petergarnett (Cumans)
claymore (Abbasids) – deeter (Zangids)
claymore (Zangids) – deeter (Abbasids)
petergarnett (Abbasids) – Lysimachos (Zangids)
petergarnett (Zangids) – Lysimachos (Abbasids)
Lysimachos (Seljuk Turks) – deeter (Armenians)
Lysimachos (Armenians) – deeter (Seljuk Turks)
claymore (Seljuk Turks) – petergarnett (Armenians)
claymore (Armenians) – petergarnett (Seljuk Turks)
Standings
Qualified


Group 12
Xiccarph (Cumans) – iandavidsmith (Georgians)
Xiccarph (Georgians) – iandavidsmith (Cumans)
batesmotel (Cumans) – gazxtrix (Georgians)
batesmotel (Georgians) – gazxtrix (Cumans)
iandavidsmith (Abbasids) – batesmotel (Zangids)
iandavidsmith (Zangids) – batesmotel (Abbasids)
gazxtrix (Abbasids) – Xiccarph (Zangids)
gazxtrix (Zangids) – Xiccarph (Abbasids)
Xiccarph (Seljuk Turks) 41/40 – batesmotel (Armenians) 26/50
Xiccarph (Armenians) 38/50 – batesmotel (Seljuk Turks) 40/40
iandavidsmith (Seljuk Turks) – gazxtrix (Armenians) WIN iandavidsmith
iandavidsmith (Armenians) – gazxtrix (Seljuk Turks) WIN iandavidsmith
Standings
8 pts. iandavidsmith
5 pts. batesmotel (+13)
3 pts. Xiccarph (-13)
0 pts. gazxtrix
Qualified
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
deeter
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:52 pm

Group 11 results

Post by deeter »

deeter (Cumans) 36/47 – petergarnett (Georgians) 52/50
deeter (Georgians) 23/50 – petergarnett (Cumans) 47/47

Interesting scenario which slightly favors the Georgians and their heavy knights, but these are slow and can be avoided for awhile. Thanks for the games, Peter.

Deeter
davouthojo
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:49 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Post by davouthojo »

davouthojo (Cumans) 31/47 – deadtorius (Georgians) 55/50
davouthojo (Georgians) 18/50 – deadtorius (Cumans) 52/47

Another interesting scenario.......
pantherboy
Tournament 3rd Place
Tournament 3rd Place
Posts: 1229
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:30 pm

Post by pantherboy »

Group 9

pantherboy (Armenians) 19/50

hidde (Seljuk Turks) 42/40

I found this scenario to be rather imbalanced. A part of my losses are only because I got lazy and began doing unrequired charges that cost me 10 points or so since I was going to clearly win. I'd say make a few of the Seljuk lancers superior and some the LH average. Maybe all the LS equipped ones to make them more useful.
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

Group 11

A perfect draw after two exactly specular games! :shock:

petergarnett (Abbasids) 33/47 Lysimachos (Zangids) 44/44
Lysimachos (Abbasids) 33/47 petergarnett (Zangids) 44/44
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
hidde
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:31 am

Post by hidde »

Group 9

Triarius (Abbasids) 47/47 – hidde (Zangids) 33/44
Triarius (Zangids) 47/44 – hidde (Abbasids) 29/47

Two great games. Both hanged in the balance for many turns.
With the Abbasids I managed to protect a weak left flank untill the last turn. Then it was to late for the Zangids...
With the Zangids I was blessed with a hero unit. We all get them from time to time but seldom can one say that
the outcome of the entire battle were due to that one unit. Perhaps this isn't the case for me in this battle either but it sure felt that way.
A Kurdish lancer pursued an evading LH and ended up in contact with three Abbasid cavalry. One more of mine made contact that same turn.
All the rest charged in my next turn. Had my lancer crumbled the whole line would have been in danger.
Instead he remained steady and inflicted heavy casualties on the Abbasids. My charges also went well and from there on I could go on to win that crucial cavalry fight.
Great scenario.
Lysimachos
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1502
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 am
Location: Italy

Post by Lysimachos »

I found this scenario to be rather imbalanced. A part of my losses are only because I got lazy and began doing unrequired charges that cost me 10 points or so since I was going to clearly win. I'd say make a few of the Seljuk lancers superior and some the LH average. Maybe all the LS equipped ones to make them more useful.
pantherboy
Though I may partly agree with the preceeding statement it is also to be said that the Turks already have been assigned in the scenario 599 pts. vs the 567 pts of the Armenians, wich means that the problem lies, above all, in the way the system assigns the points, greatly emphasizing the cost of LH units in confront with LF ones.
Something that can be clearly seen when building up a DAG cavalry army.
"Audentis fortuna iuvat"
- Virgilius

(Good luck favours the brave)
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

Lysimachos wrote:
I found this scenario to be rather imbalanced. A part of my losses are only because I got lazy and began doing unrequired charges that cost me 10 points or so since I was going to clearly win. I'd say make a few of the Seljuk lancers superior and some the LH average. Maybe all the LS equipped ones to make them more useful.
pantherboy
Though I may partly agree with the preceeding statement it is also to be said that the Turks already have been assigned in the scenario 599 pts. vs the 567 pts of the Armenians, wich means that the problem lies, above all, in the way the system assigns the points, greatly emphasizing the cost of LH units in confront with LF ones.
Something that can be clearly seen when building up a DAG cavalry army.
Some of it that helps the Armenians is the big hill in the middle with the steep slopes. This allows them to get many of their infantry into play when it wouldn't be safe to do so out in the open facing the Seljuk mounted. Something else of note is that poor LH is not nearly as much of a bargain as poor LH. The Seljuks might well have been better off with fewer but better LH. You could also consider making the Ghilmen only bow or only lance. The TT army lists explicitly do not give any cavalry lance and bow. It's either one or the other or lance on bow*. Similarly with light spear and bow, it cavalry have both they are normally bow*. Any of these changes would reduce the cost of some of the Seljuk cavalry and the points could have been used instead to upgrade them to superior or to give Seljuks more troops.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

Group 12

batesmotel(Zangids) 38/44 - iandavidsmith(Abbasids) 51/47

batesmotel(Abbasids) 30/47 - iandavidsmith(Zangids) 46/44

Thanks for to IDS for two good games and to Lysimachos for another good scenario.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Leagues & Tournaments & Seeking Opponents”