A couple of questions

Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
iversonjm
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:47 pm

A couple of questions

Post by iversonjm »

I apologize if these have been covered already. I don't frequent this forum that often.

1. If a battlewagon with a lt. artillery shooting capability moves, can it shoot? 1st bullet on 106 says "Artillery whose battle group moved" may not shoot. Question is whether battlewagons w/ arty capability qualify as "Artillery" under this definition.

2. May a battlegroup providing rear support to artillery declare an intercept charge? If so, does it measure its ZOI from the front edge of the artillery?

Thanks in advance.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Question 1: its a war wagon not artillery. Regardless of what it is carrying it should be able to shoot as normal, so I would say yes it can move and shoot.

Question 2: I went through the rules and can not find anything that would stop you from making an intercept charge, but keep in mind that you can only move straight through from front to back of the artillery so depending on if it has pivoted you might not be facing correctly. All moves are made as if the BG was at the front of the artillery base so you wold measure 2 MU's from the front of the artillery base. Remember that only foot can interpenetrate artillery so trying to sneak out your brave cav boys on that one :wink:

Of course I would wonder why you would want to intercept from an artillery support as your enemy has to fight the supporting BG and can not attack the actual gun unless it beat the supporting BG. If you are that worried about them what would make you think intercepting would help the cause at all?
iversonjm
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:47 pm

Post by iversonjm »

deadtorius wrote:Of course I would wonder why you would want to intercept from an artillery support as your enemy has to fight the supporting BG and can not attack the actual gun unless it beat the supporting BG. If you are that worried about them what would make you think intercepting would help the cause at all?
You may want to protect an adjacent unit that is a charge target.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: A couple of questions

Post by rbodleyscott »

iversonjm wrote:2. May a battlegroup providing rear support to artillery declare an intercept charge? If so, does it measure its ZOI from the front edge of the artillery?
No, because that would involve interpenetrating the artillery, wouldn't it. (Even though the front edges are deemed to be in the same place).
Last edited by rbodleyscott on Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

deadtorius wrote:Question 1: its a war wagon not artillery. Regardless of what it is carrying it should be able to shoot as normal, so I would say yes it can move and shoot.
That appears to be correct. (Works for Kutna Hora, albeit prior to the FOGR period).
iversonjm
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: A couple of questions

Post by iversonjm »

rbodleyscott wrote:
iversonjm wrote:2. May a battlegroup providing rear support to artillery declare an intercept charge? If so, does it measure its ZOI from the front edge of the artillery?
No, because that would involve interpenetrating the artillery, wouldn't it. (Even though the front edges are deemed to be in the same place).
Fair enough, although given the language used in the text its a bit ambiguous as to whether an interpenetration is actually occuring.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Was not too sure on the artillery thing and my first thought was no you can't but after reading the rules I could not find anything to say otherwise. Perhaps it is a FAQ thing that should be added.
Thanks for clearing that one up.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Since were on about rules questions here is one for you:
Dragoons in an enclosed field can get protection if they are entirely in the terrain feature. So if they get charged by mounted for example they can claim the protected foot POA?

The notorious Parliamentarian Poodle hating Lord Blathergut has a nasty habit of picking the smallest enclosed field he can find so my 3 bases of dragoons can't hide in it in a line, one of them has to drop back or risk sticking out and not getting the terrain bonus :x
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

deadtorius wrote:Since were on about rules questions here is one for you:
Dragoons in an enclosed field can get protection if they are entirely in the terrain feature. So if they get charged by mounted for example they can claim the protected foot POA?
Yes. that's what it is for.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Curse Lord Blathergut for trying to force my poor Dragoons to stand outside those fields of safety then.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”