Flank Charge Rule

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Flank Charge Rule

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

One of the conditions for a flank charge listed on page 55 is, "The charging battle group starts with at least one base entirely behind...the enemy battle group."

Should this read "one front rank base"?

The text in the diagram boxes on page 57 uses the term "front rank base". Suppose the right hand cavalry BG had only two bases and the two bases covered by the 2MU measuring stick did not exist. The back base would qualify the BG for a legal flank charge using the text on page 55, but is not a front rank base and wouldn't qualify using the text in the diagram.

Thanks.

Terry G.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

From the errata:

P.57 Diagram. Top right text box currently reads “Yes. This BG has one of its front rank bases entirely
behind the line and no part of its bases to the target’s front”

It should read: “Yes. This BG has at least one of its bases entirely behind the line and no part of any of its
bases to the target’s front."
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

So then, if I have a BG in a 1x6 column and am attacking an enemy BG from its flank at an angle such that my first and second rank bases are not completely behind the enemy Bg's extended front line -but- the third rank base of my column (and all those behind it) IS completely behind the line, this is a legal flank attack?

That seems a bit cheesy to me but I take your reply to mean the text on page 55 is correct and the text on page 57 has been amended to match it.

Thanks.

Terry G.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”