Cohesion test modifiers

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
zacknafein
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:20 pm

Cohesion test modifiers

Post by zacknafein »

If my MF lost impact combat against Impact foot Heavy foot are the modifiers -2 or -1?
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Re: Cohesion test modifiers

Post by nikgaukroger »

zacknafein wrote:If my MF lost impact combat against Impact foot Heavy foot are the modifiers -2 or -1?

IIRC the losing to IF and losing to HF in the open are all within the same "Any one of" box on the CT table and, thus, it is just -1.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Robert241167
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1368
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by Robert241167 »

I'm at work Nik so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

The -1 counts for Impact Foot in impact.

The other -1 counts for MF losing to HF in melee.

There is not a specific -1 for MF losing to HF (non-Impact Foot) in impact.

Rob
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Robert241167 wrote:I'm at work Nik so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
:lol:
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

Robert, you're wrong!

The - for MF losing to HF is for Close Combat, so Impact or Melee.

The - for losing to Impact Foot is for Close Combat only.

But, as Nik said, they are both in the "If any applies" category, so are not cumulative at Impact.
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

Kevin, I think you meant the -1 for losing to Impact Foot is for the Impact Phase only.

Terry G.
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

Yes, I'm wrong too!
Robert241167
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1368
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by Robert241167 »

Woohoo !!!

Is that one point for me? :lol:

Rob
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

I think it's more like one own goal each :oops:
Robert241167
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1368
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by Robert241167 »

Ooh b*gger.

I better start swatting the rulebook before Challenge.

Rob
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”