Please vote: Finland map update

Peter Stauffenberg · Post by **Peter Stauffenberg** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:08 pm

Since we now have the possibility to rail units in Finland I wondered if we should add a city in northeastern Finland (on-map) like Joensuu or Kuopio. This will be a city without production so it only be a rail hub.

http://www.godoy.no/weber/2verdskrigweb ... nd_map.gif

Kuopio is a city of about 100.000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuopio

Joensuu is a city of about 75.000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joensuu

This is how it could look:

1. Add Joensuu
2. Add Kuopio

pk867 · Post by **pk867** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:14 pm

Hi Borger,

I vote for both.

Paul

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:34 pm

schwerpunkt · Post by **schwerpunkt** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:56 pm

I think both - Kuopio will help the Finns defensively whilst Joensuu will generally help the russians as it will be difficult for the Finns to defend and a useful rail head for the russians.

PS: As per the Finnish Corps voting thread, I recommend that II INF corps and VI GAR corps be switched as it will be even more important for the Finns to have an INF corps starting in Joensuu.

gerones · Post by **gerones** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 2:04 pm

It looks like adding only one more city (e.g. Joensuu) plus the changes in finnish organization, defense levels, etc. should be enough but I´m also fine with adding 2 cities.

PionUrpo · Post by **PionUrpo** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 2:45 pm

Add both.

EDIT: Or Sortavala instead of Joensuu, although it would be on Soviet territory after Winter War.

Hammer4000 · Post by **Hammer4000** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 3:32 pm

yea both

rkr1958 · Post by **rkr1958** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 3:43 pm

Both.

BuddyGrant · Post by **BuddyGrant** » Sun Mar 27, 2011 9:40 pm

No to both due to unanticipated impact of such a change. No strong objections though if others more familiar with GS2 are good with it.

JimR · Post by **JimR** » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:35 am

OK to both. The play-balance effect is probably neutral.

Schnurri · Post by **Schnurri** » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:46 am

Yes to both.

Hammer4000 · Post by **Hammer4000** » Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:49 am

yea i like both this way at least you have somewhat of a more advantage for defending in the North instead of just woods

NotaPacifist · Post by **NotaPacifist** » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:47 am

aye to both