Thoughts on Colonies and Conquest
Moderators: hammy, terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Thoughts on Colonies and Conquest
The armies covered by Colonies and Conquest are not generally the sort of armies I would choose but they present an interestingly varied selection that is very different from what is in the first 3 books. The Chinese style mixed battle groups are an interesting innovation.
The quality seems to be the highest of all the volumes so far and I learnt a lot about the history of the period. Even though I will probably use only one, or at most 2, of the armies I do find it an interesting book and am really glad I purchased it.
The quality seems to be the highest of all the volumes so far and I learnt a lot about the history of the period. Even though I will probably use only one, or at most 2, of the armies I do find it an interesting book and am really glad I purchased it.
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28323
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillasazrael86 wrote:It also seems we are missing colonial Spanish?
Hence the Colonial Spanish are in "Cities of Gold"
I was thinking we might have a Phillippine version.rbodleyscott wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillasazrael86 wrote:It also seems we are missing colonial Spanish?
Hence the Colonial Spanish are in "Cities of Gold"
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28323
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
khurasan_miniatures
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 480
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am
RBS, taking his marching orders from the pope again!rbodleyscott wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillasazrael86 wrote:It also seems we are missing colonial Spanish?
Hence the Colonial Spanish are in "Cities of Gold"
moghuls
bit disappointed that mughals don't get to upgrade to muskets in 17th c a la Gush because their gunpowder is rubbish
still they get to field average cavalry instead of all superior saving points as an option
and elephants are optional (but what self respecting mughal general won't field at least 2 nellies)
still they get to field average cavalry instead of all superior saving points as an option
and elephants are optional (but what self respecting mughal general won't field at least 2 nellies)
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
I think you are over-reacting to one tercio vs 2 BGs of Elephants.Scrumpy wrote:The Elephant armies get plenty of LF to absorb musketry. OK artillery might be a problem, but a good player will ensure their is enough crap to get shot at to protect the big grey beasties.
I think Elephants are a threat, but not certain how serious.
Re: Thoughts on Colonies and Conquest
I am interested in the Colonial armies, the Dutch mainly, but are there many figures available for this period, in particular mid to late 17th century? Any idea of manufacturers for late 17th century Dutch colonials or likely looking substitutes (in 15mm)? Unfortunately I'm not sure that too many of the Colonies and Conquest armies will feature on the battlefield.timmy1 wrote:The armies covered by Colonies and Conquest are not generally the sort of armies I would choose but they present an interestingly varied selection that is very different from what is in the first 3 books. The Chinese style mixed battle groups are an interesting innovation.
The quality seems to be the highest of all the volumes so far and I learnt a lot about the history of the period. Even though I will probably use only one, or at most 2, of the armies I do find it an interesting book and am really glad I purchased it.
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: Thoughts on Colonies and Conquest
Yep, I think that is an intriguing one and there are a few others around that are of interest. As I dug through the lists hard I found a few more, but they look very vulnerable without terrain.davids wrote: I am interested in the Colonial armies, the Dutch mainly, but are there many figures available for this period, in particular mid to late 17th century? Any idea of manufacturers for late 17th century Dutch colonials or likely looking substitutes (in 15mm)? Unfortunately I'm not sure that too many of the Colonies and Conquest armies will feature on the battlefield.
Grumpy's has some figures I think.






