Leeds Issue- Casualty removal

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
andy816
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:21 am

Leeds Issue- Casualty removal

Post by andy816 »

lawrenceg wrote:

My opponent took off a dead element in such a way that a friendly unit was now over 3 mu away from a breaking unit, thus avoiding the CT.
LAwrence Greaves



This was a move i made and i have a great deal of sympathy with Lawrences' dislike of the situation.

It arose because there was a one element wide gap between two of my BGs. If i had routed through a failed CT then this nearest BG would have had to test. Because i routed through the death roll/auto break mechanism i could remove the casualty before having to test any BGs for a rout within 3MU, and so obviosly removed the element which would create the 2 element wide gap. It does seem a little unfair that i was able to escape through what does appear to be an annomoly.

Cheers

Andy Robinson

PS. Yes i've looked in the glossary :lol:
Last edited by andy816 on Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

Because i routed through the death roll/auto break mechanism i could remove the casualty before having to test any BGs for a rout within 3MU,
That is a very good point which I had overlooked in the heat of the moment.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”