LT DAG Lists Errors
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
LT DAG Lists Errors
Only a niddly one: in the principate lists: auxilary should be consistently auxiliary.
Later Sarmatian instead Later Sarmation list.
Just a quick spot.
Dacian list: Impact Foot, Swordsmen named.. Javelinmen (?!!)
Dacian list: no Heavy Foot (which is available in editor)
Rise of Rome: no early republican list (it should have been added by LT).
Dacian list: Impact Foot, Swordsmen named.. Javelinmen (?!!)
Dacian list: no Heavy Foot (which is available in editor)
Rise of Rome: no early republican list (it should have been added by LT).
Last edited by cothyso on Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Later edit:Blathergut wrote:In RoR lists: Help mentions an Mid-Republic (early) list added. I see it in the new FoG folder beside the RoR folder, but not in RoR itself, if that matters. I do see the 3rd punic war carthage list in RoR.
I also see the Mid-Republic (early) in the FoG list. but the beta email was talking about an Early Republican, not Mid-Republican (early), and in RoR, not in FoG.
Last edited by cothyso on Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
ianiow
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D

- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:24 am
- Location: Isle of Wight, UK
I dont see Mid Republic (early) OR Early Republican.cothyso wrote:I see the Mid-Republic (early) in the RoR list. but the beta email was talking about an Early Republican, not Mid-Republican (early).Blathergut wrote:In RoR lists: Help mentions an Mid-Republic (early) list added. I see it in the new FoG folder beside the RoR folder, but not in RoR itself, if that matters. I do see the 3rd punic war carthage list in RoR.
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
Later Sarmatian instead Later Sarmation list. Just a quick spot.
>> Fixed, for the 1.4.8 update.
Dacian list: Impact Foot, Swordsmen named.. Javelinmen (?!!)
>> This is correct and is from the printed lists.
Dacian list: no Heavy Foot (which is available in editor)
>> This is correct, as per the printed listed. The editor just gives you more options.
Rise of Rome: no early republican list (it should have been added by LT).
>> This is in the new Field of Glory DAG option
Keith
>> Fixed, for the 1.4.8 update.
Dacian list: Impact Foot, Swordsmen named.. Javelinmen (?!!)
>> This is correct and is from the printed lists.
Dacian list: no Heavy Foot (which is available in editor)
>> This is correct, as per the printed listed. The editor just gives you more options.
Rise of Rome: no early republican list (it should have been added by LT).
>> This is in the new Field of Glory DAG option
Keith
-
grumblefish
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:46 pm
-
grumblefish
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:46 pm
Early Visigothic
Look at the Gepid allies:
Gepid Foot Warriors - Says they're footmen, but the graphic is that of cavalry.
By looking at the Gepid army list itself, it appears that the problem is this: the Gepid army list features 2 types of cavalry, while the Early Visigothic Gepid Allies list only has 1 type. The cavalry graphic that shows up when you look at the gepid allies "foot warriors" is the same graphic for the second type of cavalry from the actual Gepid army list (which is missing from the allies).
Look at the Gepid allies:
Gepid Foot Warriors - Says they're footmen, but the graphic is that of cavalry.
By looking at the Gepid army list itself, it appears that the problem is this: the Gepid army list features 2 types of cavalry, while the Early Visigothic Gepid Allies list only has 1 type. The cavalry graphic that shows up when you look at the gepid allies "foot warriors" is the same graphic for the second type of cavalry from the actual Gepid army list (which is missing from the allies).
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
In RoR lists: Help mentions an Mid-Republic (early) list added. I see it in the new FoG folder beside the RoR folder, but not in RoR itself, if that matters. I do see the 3rd punic war carthage list in RoR.
If there us a typo its in the help file. There old MRR list is still part of RoR and there is a new MRR list in the the free FOG DAG. Apologies for any confusion. Keith
If there us a typo its in the help file. There old MRR list is still part of RoR and there is a new MRR list in the the free FOG DAG. Apologies for any confusion. Keith
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
grumblefish
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:46 pm
Both of the Kushan lists have "Swordsmem".
edit: Indo-scythians have the same problem
edit: Indo-scythians have the same problem
Last edited by grumblefish on Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
