fragmented BG charged by 2 or more BG

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
domblas
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Montpellier, France

fragmented BG charged by 2 or more BG

Post by domblas »

Does it test -1 because he has more than one reason to test?

fogly
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

I would say yes.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Post by Polkovnik »

There is only one reason - charged whilst fragmented. So I would say no.
Petefloro
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:35 pm
Location: Kent

Post by Petefloro »

I might as well chip one in while I'm here. :)

I say no - I remember this from another thread some time ago.

I think,two reasons to test applies when you see friends break within 3MU and a friendly commander in line of command is killed with in 3MU.

The test is taken at the end of the relevant phase,rather than immediately,like when you lose a combat or fragged BG charged.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

I would say yes.
I have to disagree with you on this one Phil - sorry - but I agree that it could be open to interpretation.

Multiple causes are listed on page 113, continued on page 114. Fragged troops being charged by multiple opponents is not listed here - that's why I don't think it's a multiple cause.
Pete
domblas
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Montpellier, France

Post by domblas »

petedalby wrote:
I would say yes.
I have to disagree with you on this one Phil - sorry - but I agree that it could be open to interpretation.

Multiple causes are listed on page 113, continued on page 114. Fragged troops being charged by multiple opponents is not listed here - that's why I don't think it's a multiple cause.
thats also my understanding of the rules. So "no" would be the good answer to my question in title . Subsequent question: if a BG sees two generals die or if it sees two BG breaking, does it test at -1, for more than one reason to test ?

fogly
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

domblas wrote:[Subsequent question: if a BG sees two generals die or if it sees two BG breaking, does it test at -1, for more than one reason to test ?

fogly
Or a combination of those, yes.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”