Reform moves

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
rpayne
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:57 pm

Reform moves

Post by rpayne »

This is a minor issue but something that has happened to me before, and seems easy to fix.

Lets say you have a unit that is mixed troops. We'll take Roman foot with LF support as the example. Your unit is deployed like so:

HF | HF
HF | HF
LF | LF

Now lets say you are attacked, and expand the 2 LF onto the overlap position to get an extra die, so your unit is now like so:

LF | HF | HF
LF | HF | HF

Then, as a result of the combat, lets say you break your opponent, but lose two stands of heavy foot in the process. Your unit is now like so:

LF | HF
LF | HF


The problem occurs at this point, where in order to get the Light Foot back into the rear rank, you have to expand and then contract, or do a 90 degree turn and then wheel to face the same direction. Both of these things are often impossible given the position of nearby units. You cannot simply reform, because you are in a legal formation as is.

It'd be nice to see a CMT move that allows you to rearrange the bases within a BG while keeping the same formation, to fix odd things like this.

Or perhaps this is intended? I dunno!
Mehrunes
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:21 pm

Post by Mehrunes »

Is it a legal formation? In a legal formation, every base has at least one edge and one corner contact with its neighbours.

In this formation

LF | HF
LF | HF

the 2nd rank HF hasn't any corner contact with the 2nd rank LF.
rpayne
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:57 pm

Post by rpayne »

That is actually a good point. It is not a legal formation.

It would be a legal formation if it was MF with LF in back of it, but I'm not sure many armies have that.

Probably not worth fretting over, then.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”