What constitutes "STEADY"?

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Anleiher
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:54 pm

What constitutes "STEADY"?

Post by Anleiher »

Gentlemen,

Am I correct in assuming that a spear unit in DISRUPTED status retains the spear bonus? I ask because I had always assumed not, but a careful reading of the POA's doesn't mention DISRUPTED as a reason for losing the spear POA.

Thanks,
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

Steady means not suffering from disruption or fragmentation. Offensive or defensive spearmen retain their POA if disrupted, but would not cancel the POA of swordsmen and lancers. Also, mounted facing steady foot must break off in the JAP.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
fatismo
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:20 am

Post by fatismo »

disrupted spear retains it's spear bonus but if opponents are using sword they now get the bonus, this is what impact foot are looking for
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: What constitutes "STEADY"?

Post by zoltan »

Anleiher wrote:Gentlemen,

Am I correct in assuming that a spear unit in DISRUPTED status retains the spear bonus? I ask because I had always assumed not, but a careful reading of the POA's doesn't mention DISRUPTED as a reason for losing the spear POA.

Thanks,
Yes, disrupted spear still get a + POA. The rules are very clear on this point.

Disrupted spear are not "steady spear" so swordsmen get a + POA against disrupted spear.
zeitoun
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: poitiers FRANCE

Post by zeitoun »

disorder troop are not steady too.
Olivier Marceau
early carthage
later carthage
HWY continental
WOTR Yorkish, Tudor and Lancastre
Perses Sassanids
Francais Ordonnance
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

IIRC there is a table in the Battle Group Deterioration section of the rules which shows a definition of Steady - which is basically a BG that has not suffered cohesion loss and is not disordered in any way.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

IIRC there is a table in the Battle Group Deterioration section of the rules which shows a definition of Steady - which is basically a BG that has not suffered cohesion loss and is not disordered in any way.
You do RC - Page 24
Pete
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

nikgaukroger wrote:IIRC there is a table in the Battle Group Deterioration section of the rules which shows a definition of Steady - which is basically a BG that has not suffered cohesion loss and is not disordered in any way.
In FoG there are 4 "cohesion levels"
1. Steady
2. Disrupted
3. Fragmented
4. Broken

The original post here really had two questions:

Q1. What constitutes "steady"?
A. All BG's whose cohesion level is not disrupted, fragmented or broken

Q2. Does a spear BG with a cohesion level of "disrupted" still get a + POA?
A. Yes
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

zoltan wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote:IIRC there is a table in the Battle Group Deterioration section of the rules which shows a definition of Steady - which is basically a BG that has not suffered cohesion loss and is not disordered in any way.
In FoG there are 4 "cohesion levels"
1. Steady
2. Disrupted
3. Fragmented
4. Broken

The original post here really had two questions:

Q1. What constitutes "steady"?
A. All BG's whose cohesion level is not disrupted, fragmented or broken

Q2. Does a spear BG with a cohesion level of "disrupted" still get a + POA?
A. Yes
Which is all true but ovelooks the fact that disordered troops are not steady........

A BG is STEADY if it is not anything else i.e. not disrupted, disordered, fragmented, severley disordered or broken.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

hammy wrote:
Which is all true but ovelooks the fact that disordered troops are not steady........

A BG is STEADY if it is not anything else i.e. not disrupted, disordered, fragmented, severley disordered or broken.
I disagree! ;->)

Steady is explicitly defined as one of 4 Cohesion Levels.

Disordered and severly disordered are not listed as Cohesion Levels.

Spear/pike who are (merely) disordered are therefore steady (don't complain to me!).

Spear/pike who are (merely) disordered (and not severly disordered) still get a + POA.

Swordsmen fighting (merely) disordered spear/pike still get a + POA as their disordered opponents are steady.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

I disagree! ;->)

Steady is explicitly defined as one of 4 Cohesion Levels.

Disordered and severly disordered are not listed as Cohesion Levels.
I am sorry that you disagree and I suggest you read Page 133 - this clearly states that Disorder and Severe Disorder mean that a BG can not count as Steady.
Pete
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Please read page 133 - table at the top.

I foresee random rulings at the IWC ...
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

I foresee random rulings at the IWC ...
Now don't be unkind Nik - there's still time for us to get Zoltan on the right track - :twisted:
Pete
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

petedalby wrote:
I foresee random rulings at the IWC ...
Now don't be unkind Nik - there's still time for us to get Zoltan on the right track - :twisted:

Or the IWF could fly us out 1st Class to do the umpiring 8)
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

nikgaukroger wrote:
petedalby wrote:
I foresee random rulings at the IWC ...
Now don't be unkind Nik - there's still time for us to get Zoltan on the right track - :twisted:

Or the IWF could fly us out 1st Class to do the umpiring 8)
Sshhh, how do you think I am funding my trip ;) :twisted:
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Post by bbotus »

Nik and Pete, thanks for the page 133 reference. I thought I had seen that before but I could not find it again.

So, a unit of 8 pike in 2x4 block with only the front 2 bases in open terrain and the back ranks in difficult terrain would still be entitled to the + for 3 ranks of steady pike but would not get the + for the 4th rank and would be severly disordered for movement and all tests. Does that sound right?
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by zoltan »

petedalby wrote:
I disagree! ;->)

Steady is explicitly defined as one of 4 Cohesion Levels.

Disordered and severly disordered are not listed as Cohesion Levels.
I am sorry that you disagree and I suggest you read Page 133 - this clearly states that Disorder and Severe Disorder mean that a BG can not count as Steady.
Fair cop - its great having so many willing helpers prepared to do the 'ard yards when I can't be bovverred. ;->) Who mentioned the word encylomaniac?
Anleiher
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:54 pm

Post by Anleiher »

Or the IWF could fly us out 1st Class to do the umpiring Cool
Do you SKYPE? I could afford that.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

So, a unit of 8 pike in 2x4 block with only the front 2 bases in open terrain and the back ranks in difficult terrain would still be entitled to the + for 3 ranks of steady pike but would not get the + for the 4th rank and would be severly disordered for movement and all tests. Does that sound right?
Partly. It is quite an unusual scenario that you describe - but here's my take on it.

All of the fighting bases are in the open - so the BG gets 4 dice.

The front rank bases are not severely disordered, the 3rd rank is - but there are still 3 ranks - so the POA for 3 rank pikes applies.

It is the front base that needs to be in the open to get the 4th rank + - so it still gets this.

And yes, the BG is considered to be Severely Disordered for CTs & CMTs and slowed for movement.

Others inevitably may disagree.
Pete
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3111
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Or the IWF could fly us out 1st Class to do the umpiring
I'd do it for economy!
Pete
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”