Hmmm charge on evade capable troops

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Jilu
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:14 pm

Hmmm charge on evade capable troops

Post by Jilu »

I says on page 58 (if the enemy who would be charged are capable of evading etc etc)

Does that mean that f a KN unit is at 6 MU from a unit that can evade can declare a charge on them???
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Does that mean that f a KN unit is at 6 MU from a unit that can evade can declare a charge on them???
The short answer is 'no' - a target must be within normal charge range before you can declare a charge.

This section of the rules is concerned with troops who may charge even though you don't want them to.

If a Kn BG is within 4 MU of an enemy BG (in open terrain) and you don't wish to charge, you must CMT to prevent them charging, unless one of the bullet points on Page 58 applies.

If the the enemy BG is within 4 MU, but a variable could move the Kn BG up to 2MU extra, then you take that 2 MU into account in determining whether a CMT is required or not. So lets say an additional enemy BG of elephants was at 5MU, then the Kn BG would not be required to CMT not to charge the 'evade capable' enemy BG within 4 MU. They could of course choose to charge the enemy BG within 4 MU if they wished to, but are not forced to do so.

I'm probably not explaining that very well but hope it helps?
Pete
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Hmmm charge on evade capable troops

Post by philqw78 »

Jilu wrote:I says on page 58 (if the enemy who would be charged are capable of evading etc etc)

Does that mean that f a KN unit is at 6 MU from a unit that can evade can declare a charge on them???
No it means it does not have to declare a charge if that charge would reach disordering terrain, hit mounted if foot, leave rough terrain if MF, etc.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

petedalby wrote:I've got sore feet
Did you get up the mountain or do we get a refund?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Jilu
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:14 pm

Post by Jilu »

okk that paragraph was just misleading then

thx
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

I think this is the paragraph where the typesetters added an extra blank line and split the rule in two making it read incorrectly. I don't have my rules to hand so cannot check this :(
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”