BG contracting before impact - how can we fix

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

lawrenceg wrote:So would it solve it if, when only 1 base of a column is in contact, it and its opponent roll double the normal number of dice?
Column is a manouver formation, not a battle formation. So it's use should be discouraged close to enemy. AND those turning into column to produce an intercept flank charge would love the extra dice.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
spikemesq
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:18 am

Post by spikemesq »

Like I said, change the -1 CT modifier for impacts to "lost" instead of 1 HP3B, and column charges look a lot less interesting.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

spikemesq wrote:Like I said, change the -1 CT modifier for impacts to "lost" instead of 1 HP3B, and column charges look a lot less interesting.
But if a column loses it must have taken 1 HP3. It punishes those not in column who may not take 1HP3 when they lose.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Jilu
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:14 pm

Post by Jilu »

philqw78 wrote:
lawrenceg wrote:So would it solve it if, when only 1 base of a column is in contact, it and its opponent roll double the normal number of dice?
Column is a manouver formation, not a battle formation. So it's use should be discouraged close to enemy. AND those turning into column to produce an intercept flank charge would love the extra dice.
yes and those who turn to avoid a flank charge? or would the 'column penality' not be to receive a charge?

If a column is a manouvre formation should it no be easier to expand for drilled or undrilled, as they need to form a 'natural' battle formation to impact/fight?
Lycanthropic
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:48 pm

Post by Lycanthropic »

Sign the petition! Save the "To be disadvantaged in Column" alternative lifestyle battlegroups.

Our membership includes:-

Republican Roman - Triari - 2 Superior Armoured Offensive Spear
Ordonnance French - Gendarmes - 2 Superior Knights
War of the Roses - Royal Household Knights - 2 Superior Knights
War of the Roses - Mecenary Pikemen - 4 Average Pikemen
Early Hungarian - Teutonic Knights - 2 Superior Knights
Nikephorian Byzantine - Kataphractaritaritaritari - 2 Elite Cats
Ottoman Turkish - Turka Derka Nobles - 2 Elite Bow Cav
Successor - Agema - 2 Elite Lancer Cav


Endorsed by Napoleon "Viva La Column!"
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

Knights should always be penalized for fighting in column.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Lycanthropic
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:48 pm

Post by Lycanthropic »

?????? Wedge anyone???????
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

A myth. Read Delbrueck.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
expendablecinc
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm

Post by expendablecinc »

Is this really prevalent enough to warrant.

What are people really experiencing that is a problem.

Defensive spearmen charging around in column then expanding into mellee.

Ghilmen contracting to column vs arab lancers prior to impact?

If the chargers are wider than the defenders often a slight wheel is enough to scoop up the base hiding in the back rank (unless the two BGs are perfectly parallel and lined up prior to impact.

It the issue columns generally or wide groups in battle lines contracting a little to crete gaps prior to impact, then expanding after the fight. eg spearmen vs impact foot sword.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Cavalry against camels, always. Cavalry against spears or, if they have to fight them, pikes. Its mainly a cavalry problem because they are normally a 4 base BG and can get into column easily and after impact they expand to their normal fighting width. I see it a lot.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
zeitoun
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: poitiers FRANCE

Post by zeitoun »

and what about : if you want to expand in melee make a CMT. If BG in column must make a CMT to feed base in melee , it will be very dangerous to charge in column or received a charge in column. .....
Olivier Marceau
early carthage
later carthage
HWY continental
WOTR Yorkish, Tudor and Lancastre
Perses Sassanids
Francais Ordonnance
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

philqw78 wrote:Cavalry against camels, always. Cavalry against spears or, if they have to fight them, pikes. Its mainly a cavalry problem because they are normally a 4 base BG and can get into column easily and after impact they expand to their normal fighting width. I see it a lot.
Armoured infantry with Light spear/sword against MF with light spear/bow. Armoured infantry with heavy weapon against protected impact foot/sword. I see it a lot too.
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

Lycanthropic wrote:Sign the petition! Save the "To be disadvantaged in Column" alternative lifestyle battlegroups.
This is fixed by a 2-base unit rule ala FOGR where they get +1 on the death roll. exempt 2 base elements that don't roll 2 dice in melee.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”