So far so good

[shawnt63]

So far, I have had no problems outside of the ones already reported (Cilician Armenian army list fault 1.3.7 etc). I must say I like the options on the evade - great idea, I am generally happy with the models although there are a couple that do seem small but apparently already in the mix to be corrected.

I was a bit disappointed with the very minor addition of ready to play scenarios, is this just a matter of no input or limited space?

Terrain - is it at all possible to add a fort type of terrain? I am not talking siege warfare but almost like earth ramparts? Holds only 1 bg but offers full armour, or something like that?
Will there be any siege opportunity in the future? Lots of fights over castles in the crusader era with not all that many full pitched battles - just a thought. I think it could be reasonably styilized.

I was going through for fun to build armies to 1000 pts and found a lot can't be - is there any way of pro-rating the Minimums and Maximums so that if you go from 750 to 1000 points you would get xx more mins and max's to stay in the right context but allow to build to 1000 pts?

By the way the models are superb (icons?)!

Cheers

[Scutarii]

If at least we can deploy palisades in the scen editor (like in DAG battles) and they add a serie of custom "towers" like the one in persian lists from INF is possible do small castles (not to big because the game isnt made for siege warfare) using both elements+elevation+streams and or ditches... to simulate a small fort or roman camp is enough and we can do something like the battle around Orleans with Jean of Arc

But for this add more terrain+obstacles is necessary to do it more "professional"

[IainMcNeil]

There are 10 new scenarios - this is more than previous army packs. Can you explain what you mean?

[shawnt63]

Iain, disregard, if it is more than previous then I withdraw that comment regarding lack of scenarios!

[IainMcNeil]

Just check you are getting all your are supposed to