missing things we liked in other games

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
arnimlueck
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Kornwestheim; SW Germany
Contact:

missing things we liked in other games

Post by arnimlueck »

One thing that I missed while going through the experiences so far:

How about introducing the effect of BGs loosing combat being pushed back? I know that this creates all kinds of game mechanics issues if multiple units fight. But i really liked the feel of the Battle Line being pushed back gradually if in a long struggle and slightly weaker than the opponent. Hannibals Battles come to mind but also Greek Hoplite battles. Before starting any discussion on how to do this in the AoW: is there anyone but me who would like to see such a creeping movement during melee?
Regards
Arnim
shall
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 6137
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:52 am

Post by shall »

General consensus at present seems to be that the time spent moving the figures around isn't worth it. We have played AOW with push backs in the early days. How many games have you played? People seem to get the same excitment from seeing the DISRs appear along the line etc. We can easily do push backs but is there any value added other than s little visual appeal?

Si
arnimlueck
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Kornwestheim; SW Germany
Contact:

Post by arnimlueck »

the value in practice is very limited.
What are the situations they do create? As I see it the only thing it adds in mechanics is that BGs pushing forward through a part of the enemy BL get exposed to reserve BG behind the original BL. Actually this happened very rarely even in the systems that have the feature, most noted effect probably being the DBM overlaps that are created. I opened up the point because one tactical decision to make is find the right position for your reserves behind the battle line. And the distance where this is best place is easier to estimate in a game where a melee between two BL is static until parts rout or break off. That was the point for me.
Regards
Arnim
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28285
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

arnimlueck wrote: I opened up the point because one tactical decision to make is find the right position for your reserves behind the battle line. And the distance where this is best place is easier to estimate in a game where a melee between two BL is static until parts rout or break off. That was the point for me.
Absolutely, and this is one of the reasons we abandoned push backs.
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

I have managed to take advantage of enemy troops following up a broken BG of mine on several occasions now. It can be an expensive way to draw them out of possition but it worked aganst Bruce at Usk.

You also get line breaking up if they try and chase away skirmishers or cavalry archers.

I too am not sure that q push back mechanism would add very much to the feel of a battle.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”