For the avoidance of doubt...

[timmy1]

Could the authors consider the below for inclusion in FoG:AM v2.0? It will have 3 effects,

1, Reduce the number of posts on certain threads on this forum

2, Reduce the size of certain posters' sig

3, Speed up general play

(It will also make Hammy happy but every change has a downside...)

'
In all cases where the intent of the rule is unclear and an interpretation is required, DAVE IS WRONG!
'

It probably belongs in the design philiosophy section.

:)

[david53]

Could the authors consider the below for inclusion in FoG:AM v2.0? It will have 3 effects,

1, Reduce the number of posts on certain threads on this forum

2, Reduce the size of certain posters' sig

3, Speed up general play

(It will also make Hammy happy but every change has a downside...)

'
In all cases where the intent of the rule is unclear and an interpretation is required, DAVE IS WRONG!
'

It probably belongs in the design philiosophy section.

Now do you have something wrong with daves in general or could it be just one dave?

[timmy1]

Just one... (and no not you despite you having beaten me twice at Britcon) and I don't really have anything wrong with that one Dave, in person...

[philqw78]

He was wrong when he said the Lithuanians wouldn't beat anything, but then so was Nik.