R and R Roll Call
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Ghaznavid, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
15mm Kings R&R
Alan Cutner Urathian
Allan Saull Neo Assyrian Empire
Andy Ellis Cimmerian
Darrell Pearce Neo Assyrian Empire
David Fairhurst Medes
Graham Briggs Akkadian
Graham Evans Etruscun League
Ian Stewart Neo Assyrian Empire
John Patrick Neo Babylonians
Mike Shepherd Neo Babylonian
Peter James Neo Assyrian Empire
Roger Greenwood ???
Allan Saull Neo Assyrian Empire
Andy Ellis Cimmerian
Darrell Pearce Neo Assyrian Empire
David Fairhurst Medes
Graham Briggs Akkadian
Graham Evans Etruscun League
Ian Stewart Neo Assyrian Empire
John Patrick Neo Babylonians
Mike Shepherd Neo Babylonian
Peter James Neo Assyrian Empire
Roger Greenwood ???
15mm Steppe R&R
Adrian Steer Mongol Conquest
Bob Amey Seljuk Turk
Brian Holmes Northern Dynasty Chinese
Bruce Rollett Bedouin Dynasties
Dave Ruddock Bosphoran
Gordon Jamieson Liao
Gordon Malcolm Mongol Conquest
Ian Mackay Palmyran
Keith Pullen Later Sarmatian
Keith Martin-Smith Bedouin Dynasties
Peter Townsend ???
Phil Powell Later Lithuanian
Steve Murton Seljuk Turk
Bob Amey Seljuk Turk
Brian Holmes Northern Dynasty Chinese
Bruce Rollett Bedouin Dynasties
Dave Ruddock Bosphoran
Gordon Jamieson Liao
Gordon Malcolm Mongol Conquest
Ian Mackay Palmyran
Keith Pullen Later Sarmatian
Keith Martin-Smith Bedouin Dynasties
Peter Townsend ???
Phil Powell Later Lithuanian
Steve Murton Seljuk Turk
Re: 15mm Heavy Metal R&R
Did they qualify by using Gold?bddbrown wrote: Peter Dalby Aztec
Hi Roger. Who did you sent it to? Can you resend to andrew.ellis63@ntlworld.com. Thanks.rogerg wrote:Roger Greenwood - Middle Assyrian
Sent my list two weeks ago.
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.petedalby wrote:Of course!Did they qualify by using Gold?![]()
Although with so many Knights around this may prove to be a poor choice.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
petedalby wrote:Depends on its composition but yes - the match ups for this and many others don't look too good do they?I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.
Aztec is a good choice in this pool for a good player ...
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
A mongol with steppe and no shock mounted is a very poor match up. All the rest will give a reasonable amount of terrain, to jump out at their shock troops from. Almughavars are your only problem in terrain. And whatever terrain they go in you can outnumber them.petedalby wrote:Depends on its composition but yes - the match ups for this and many others don't look too good do they?I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.
But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
stenic
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 437
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:24 pm
- Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK
In terms of Kudos it's a win/win though. If you lose then fairplay for having the cojones to give it a go and if you do well then glory will be yourspetedalby wrote:Having used the army only once I am inclined to agree with you Phil - I think I'd be much happier with Ottomans or HYW English.But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete
But we'll see how they get on.
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Ottomans, English - PAH! No glass. No feathers. Well, not enough feathers. How would you win with those?petedalby wrote:Having used the army only once I am inclined to agree with you Phil - I think I'd be much happier with Ottomans or HYW English.But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete
But we'll see how they get on.
Can't see much for the Aztecs to fear in this bunch.
Except the descendents of the Catalans...although it's slightly curious that the much vaunted SHNC and MCA have now disappeared entirely!grahambriggs wrote:
Ottomans, English - PAH! No glass. No feathers. Well, not enough feathers. How would you win with those?
Can't see much for the Aztecs to fear in this bunch.


