Commanders and routing / pursuing BG

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Commanders and routing / pursuing BG

Post by timmy1 »

I believe that it is too easy for commanders to leave routing and pursuing BG. There are a number of attested instances of commands fleeing the field but FoG does not model them. (I accept that it might be a deliberate design decision on the basis that the flee is part of the battle not represented as it occurs after army break.)

However to me it seems that when a BG with a commander in the front rank breaks or pursues, it is too easy for the commander to move off and do something else. I believe that it should require a CMT for a commander to leave a BG that is routing or pursuing.
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

That will certainly increase risk for losing commanders.

I 'd favor a one JAP turn delay before they can be committed to the front line of a new BG.

Had a great game where I flank hit an enemy line and successively over several turns went down his line breaking aobut 4 BGs. Some turned some were pinned frontally, but the key part was the only commander he had was an IC who fought in the front rank in all 4 BGs as we went down the line over several turns. It was a glorious Hollywood movie, but it seemed too easy to swap to the next BG.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”