Murmansk Convoys added to Game!

PSP/DS/PC/MAC : WWII turn based grand strategy game

Moderators: firepowerjohan, rkr1958, Happycat, Slitherine Core

Post Reply
firepowerjohan
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 7:58 pm
Contact:

Murmansk Convoys added to Game!

Post by firepowerjohan »

I added a Sea Port near Iceland which works as the Murmansk route so when USSR join the war they can get Convoys by that route (or Axis can sink them) to get additional Production Points.
vypuero
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 628
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA - USA

Post by vypuero »

Great! How much income will this amount to?
Plainian
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Dundee Scotland

Post by Plainian »

Are you going to include the southern route into Russia as well? Name escapes me? Astrakhan? Pretty sure I read that more resources reached Russia via the south than via Murmansk.
firepowerjohan
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 7:58 pm
Contact:

Post by firepowerjohan »

We only plan on the Murmansk route because we have too small map to consider the southern route. The amount is significantly large for USSR and also stretches the Atlantic for UK to cover, means there is now a great area for Axis subs to find convoys.
Last edited by firepowerjohan on Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Plainian
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Dundee Scotland

Post by Plainian »

Yes thats fine. The Murmansk convoys were an important part of British/Allied war effort. More for propaganda I believe but still significant I suppose. Also opens up the possibility of naval activity in the north.
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

Err, historically, didn't 90% of US-USSR Lend-Lease supplies come through Murmansk and Archangelsk?

They sure as hell didn't come in through Vladivostok...
vypuero
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 628
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA - USA

Post by vypuero »

some came from the Persian route through the caucasus
SMK-at-work
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 584
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:35 pm

Post by SMK-at-work »

Historically about 50% DID come through Soviet Asia - millions of tons of steel, aluminium, railway irons, etc, were much easier to ship from the US West Coast on Soviet ships that the Japanese didn't attack because they were neutral! See http://www.o5m6.de/Routes.html
vypuero
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 628
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA - USA

Post by vypuero »

very nice site. I had seen it before but not that part. Well we have the "off map" to take that into account to an extent. Perhaps it should be increased slightly and this decreased but it is at least represented.
James Taylor
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:43 am

Post by James Taylor »

For the record, 23.8% of all lendlease aid sent to USSR during WW2 went through Persia which was invaded by both UK and USSR to secure this vital route.

For the more mathematically inclined, that's 4,159,117 tons through the Persian Gulf.

Sound insignificant?
Redpossum
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1814
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:09 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:

Post by Redpossum »

Well, there's another myth blown to pieces!

Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding on this important point :)
Post Reply

Return to “MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion”