Grand Strategy Victory Stats and Summary
Moderators: firepowerjohan, Happycat, rkr1958, Slitherine Core
-
- Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:40 pm
In the end we'd like to get the margin of error small enough such that we can say with 90% confidence that the chance to win as the axis is X% and the chance to win as the allies is Y% ASSUMING matched opponents. Hopefully X% and Y% will be within the margin of error of 50% or close enough to 50% to be considered balanced.
--------------------------------------------------
Gift Ideas
Gifts
--------------------------------------------------
Gift Ideas
Gifts
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4745
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
- Location: Oslo, Norway
One problem with the chart is that it contains all games from GS v1.00. There have been quite a bit of changes from GS v1.00 to the current version. Some might have affected game play. The V1.05 changes have definitely shifted the game slightly towards the Axis. So the percentage might be different if we only had GS v1.05 or later games registered.
Added two more victories by Neil (one as the axis & one as the allies). Neil maintains his undefeated record and is one of three players (Neil, Max & Massina) who have 10 or more wins. I guess that makes these players double-aces.
Last edited by rkr1958 on Tue Oct 05, 2010 4:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
He is undefeated because he didnt play against me, at least since the stats are taken... LOL just joking, but I'd love to taint that recordrkr1958 wrote:Added two more victories by Neil (one as the axis & one as the allies). Neil maintains his undefeated record and is one of three players (Neil, Max & Massina) who have 10 or more wins. I guess that makes these players double-aces.

Personally, I'd love to see you and Neil go head to head in a game with GS v2.00. That certainly would be a "Battle of the Titans".supermax wrote:He is undefeated because he didnt play against me, at least since the stats are taken... LOL just joking, but I'd love to taint that recordrkr1958 wrote:Added two more victories by Neil (one as the axis & one as the allies). Neil maintains his undefeated record and is one of three players (Neil, Max & Massina) who have 10 or more wins. I guess that makes these players double-aces.
-
- Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:26 am
- Location: Western Australia
Max,rkr1958 wrote:Personally, I'd love to see you and Neil go head to head in a game with GS v2.00. That certainly would be a "Battle of the Titans".supermax wrote:He is undefeated because he didnt play against me, at least since the stats are taken... LOL just joking, but I'd love to taint that recordrkr1958 wrote:Added two more victories by Neil (one as the axis & one as the allies). Neil maintains his undefeated record and is one of three players (Neil, Max & Massina) who have 10 or more wins. I guess that makes these players double-aces.
You are going to miss out being the first

Neil
STOP THE PRESSES. Neil suffered his first defeat, which was handed to him by Joe Rock. This is the same Joe that handed Borger his one and only loss. All three of these players are tough opponents who I'm playing at the time and to whom I've suffered numerous defeats against. In fact, I've never come close to beating anyone of them; but enjoy playing and do learn a lot from.




-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:36 pm
Greetings,
I'll admit. I am a person who finds statistics most fascinating. Shall you produce different stats for 2.00+ games? Maybe it's just me, but wouldn't the sigificant changes from 1.xx+ warrant this? There seems to a lot of changes for 2.00+ and I think info gained from 2.00+ games would be lost if combined with earlier results.
Just curious,
_august_
I'll admit. I am a person who finds statistics most fascinating. Shall you produce different stats for 2.00+ games? Maybe it's just me, but wouldn't the sigificant changes from 1.xx+ warrant this? There seems to a lot of changes for 2.00+ and I think info gained from 2.00+ games would be lost if combined with earlier results.
Just curious,
_august_