Swords Und Scimitars
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Swords Und Scimitars
I realize IF just came out but SaS is now on the preorder page for October
Quite excited about that expansion, will complement SOA nicely as , although the 2 packs arent 100% contemporary (11th to 13th centuries vs 13th thru 15th) , they are closer to having "historical" lineups expansion pack vs pack than the others.... Plus sand terrain!
Any TT'toppers know if knights will be consider armoured or heavy armoured? (just curious)
Quite excited about that expansion, will complement SOA nicely as , although the 2 packs arent 100% contemporary (11th to 13th centuries vs 13th thru 15th) , they are closer to having "historical" lineups expansion pack vs pack than the others.... Plus sand terrain!
Any TT'toppers know if knights will be consider armoured or heavy armoured? (just curious)
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Swords Und Scimitars
Armoured until 1150, then Heavily Armoured.TheGrayMouser wrote:Any TT'toppers know if knights will be consider armoured or heavy armoured? (just curious)
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Well I"ll have at least one opponent whose excited about SaS!
Aftter being on these forums a while it does appears many players are more "into" ancient lists then the medieval, but SaS has a pretty wide variety of armies
Hopefully someday the game system will expand into Fog Ren (likly would be a new engine) Would love to have Hussars and Jannisaires duke it out!
Aftter being on these forums a while it does appears many players are more "into" ancient lists then the medieval, but SaS has a pretty wide variety of armies
Hopefully someday the game system will expand into Fog Ren (likly would be a new engine) Would love to have Hussars and Jannisaires duke it out!
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Thats the spirit!hidde wrote:Ancient, medieval, renaissance...who cares. I'll buy them all! ..and Napoleonic wars![]()
Hakkaa päälle!
Finnish war cry of light cavalryman(hakkapeliitta) in the service of King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden during the Thirty Years' War, commonly translated as "Cut them down!"
I have to admit , the only era/genre of warfare i have little interest in are Ancient Americas (ie mayans etc al)
I thought hakkapeletta meant " just because we are riding reindeers doesnt mean you can sit in our laps and tell us what you want for X-mass"
-
grumblefish
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:46 pm
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
grumblefish
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:46 pm
Yes, I can see that; little musket balls bouncing off a line of shields.deadtorius wrote:Sounds like a challenge to me. I wonder if we will be able to pit ancients against renaisance when they do FOG R
You medievals should feel free to set up a game and PM me a password; I'd be happy to stomp some tin-can men.
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
He he, I dont think they'd be bouncing, not off plywood!grumblefish wrote:Yes, I can see that; little musket balls bouncing off a line of shields.deadtorius wrote:Sounds like a challenge to me. I wonder if we will be able to pit ancients against renaisance when they do FOG R
You medievals should feel free to set up a game and PM me a password; I'd be happy to stomp some tin-can men.
Re: Swords Und Scimitars
At Crecy in 1346 the horses were not armoured. At Poitiers 1356 the French had dismounted many of their men-at-arms and armoured the horses of mounted men-at-arms so they could withstand archery better. Horses still lacked backside armour. I guess armouring the horse is not currently taken into account.rbodleyscott wrote:Armoured until 1150, then Heavily Armoured.TheGrayMouser wrote:Any TT'toppers know if knights will be consider armoured or heavy armoured? (just curious)
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Swords Und Scimitars
We had to fit all the different armour levels into 4 classes, to keep things simple. So each armour class includes a fair variety of armour level. 1150 is when the men became fully armoured.kujalar wrote:At Crecy in 1346 the horses were not armoured. At Poitiers 1356 the French had dismounted many of their men-at-arms and armoured the horses of mounted men-at-arms so they could withstand archery better. Horses still lacked backside armour. I guess armouring the horse is not currently taken into account.rbodleyscott wrote:Armoured until 1150, then Heavily Armoured.TheGrayMouser wrote:Any TT'toppers know if knights will be consider armoured or heavy armoured? (just curious)
However, you should not get too hung up on specific armour definitions, because the lists are written to get the right effect between historical opponents. Sometimes we fudge the armour classification a bit to achieve this. Late medieval troops generally get rated a bit lower than troops with the same armour would be in earlier periods - but the differentials are maintained between different late medieval troop-types.
The army lists are an integral part of the FOG rules system and the design imperative is to get realistic interactions between contemporary troops and not worry about whether anachronistic "what-ifs" are "realistic". (Because they are only fantasy anyway).
The English archers at Poitiers still managed to defeat the French knights (by shooting at the unprotected flanks of the horses). It is the end result that ultimately matters, and that is what we are simulating. I cannot think of any examples of full horse armour allowing mounted knights to defeat longbowmen behind stakes.
Last edited by rbodleyscott on Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Thats a great explanation of the game system, especially in regards to the relative value within the expansions of differing armour values. I assumed that was the case, likly thru osmosis from other forum posts and or poking around the TT forums.
4 armour levels seems sufficient, although a fifth might be nice to represent real late armour ie Gothic plate on fully barded horses
Obviously not going to happen and likly really not needed, just one of those whimsical wishlist type things...
4 armour levels seems sufficient, although a fifth might be nice to represent real late armour ie Gothic plate on fully barded horses
Obviously not going to happen and likly really not needed, just one of those whimsical wishlist type things...
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am




