If you charge a BG of impact foot already in combat do they still get their Impact Foot POA for charging. so for intsance
IF IF IF IF
IF IF IF IF
=== ^^^^ Combat between Cavalry and Impact foot
C C ^^^^
C C ^^^^
.........^^^^
.........^^^^
Impact foot charge!!
........IF IF IF IF
........IF IF IF IF
Does the IF already engaged with the Cavalry, get the bonus too?
Charging Impact Foot already in combat
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
Charging Impact Foot already in combat
Last edited by ryolacap on Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
If I take the situation correctly (and I might not) then you only fight the impact for the troops that have charged and the troops in contact with them - you wouldn't figh an impact combat against the Cavalry who are already in contact.
And yes you still count the impact foot ++ even if you are already in combat.
And yes you still count the impact foot ++ even if you are already in combat.
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3080
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Dave is correct. Rather than think of it as 'they are charging' think of it as 'it is an impact combat', and use impact POAs. It usually doesn't matter who's bases actually moved (the guys who didn't are assumed to countercharge where appropriate, you just don't move them). So in this case they would both be on a +2; no net advantage.
The only time it does matter is when the POA factor says "Unless charging x" or "if not charging", etc. This is usually foot vs shock mounted. For example; impact foot vs steady or disrupted lance armed cavalry - who are shock mounted by definition. If the IF charge, they get no POA and the lancers get a +1 for the lance. So the impact foot are better off waiting for the cavalry to charge them, when both will get a +1, so no net POA.
The only time it does matter is when the POA factor says "Unless charging x" or "if not charging", etc. This is usually foot vs shock mounted. For example; impact foot vs steady or disrupted lance armed cavalry - who are shock mounted by definition. If the IF charge, they get no POA and the lancers get a +1 for the lance. So the impact foot are better off waiting for the cavalry to charge them, when both will get a +1, so no net POA.
Mr Briggs, we well have no language of that sort on this forum.grahambriggs wrote:Dave is correct.
If you are going to juxstapose the words Dave and correct in the same sentence can you at least make it a long and rambling sentence with plenty of words inbetween. Fortunately I was not actually drinking my tea when I read this as I hate to think what state my monitor would be in now
