Elephants and longbow men stakes
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
madmike111
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:20 am
- Location: West Aussieland
Elephants and longbow men stakes
Played a game on the weekend where I discovered that my elephants ignore the stakes placed by longbow men. While this was a pleasant surprise is this correct as I would have thought that stakes would work just as well on elephants as they do against knights?
What a dirty mind! They were knocking DOWN trees, not knocking them UP.kal5056 wrote:What 2 elephants of consenting age do behind closed doors has no place being discussed on this board.philqw78 wrote:Since elephants knock down trees with gay abandon
Gino
SMAC
(Apologies to confused Britons, for whom knocking up someone means a friendly visit)
We really are 2 countries seperated by a common language aren't we?MikeK wrote:What a dirty mind! They were knocking DOWN trees, not knocking them UP.kal5056 wrote:What 2 elephants of consenting age do behind closed doors has no place being discussed on this board.philqw78 wrote:Since elephants knock down trees with gay abandon
Gino
SMAC
(Apologies to confused Britons, for whom knocking up someone means a friendly visit)
Gino
SMAC
-
peteratjet
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:36 am
I fear PDs are not an anti-pachydermal prophylactic.peteratjet wrote:The longbow men still get the benefit of MF not being in open terrain though, don't they? So it's not a complete waste, even though they do not offer complete protection against unwanted pachydermal advances.
On a serious note, MF in open terrain still count in open terrain unless defending field fortifications (see definition of open terrain). Portable defences count as field fortifications against mounted other than elephants - they provide no defensive benefit. However, troops defending PD don't conform to enemy attacking across them (even if the PD provides no defensive benefit). See p 121. This ensures the PDs are not lost by conforming away from them unless taken in flank or rear.
So that counts for something.
>(Apologies to confused Britons, for whom knocking up someone means a friendly visit)
Hmm. I think that may be one of those regionally-specific things! I don't recall ever hearing it used that way.
But I also think you should apologise to confused Americans, who as far as I have been able to ascertain "visit with" rather than "visit" somebody
Hmm. I think that may be one of those regionally-specific things! I don't recall ever hearing it used that way.
But I also think you should apologise to confused Americans, who as far as I have been able to ascertain "visit with" rather than "visit" somebody




