I can't find any of my resources and I am at the stage in life when eyesight and memory start to fail their CMTs.
Poking around on the internet it looks as if the gun tubes are exclusively or typically made of iron.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribauldequin shows an original manuscript with a grey rather than yellow barrel.
pot-de-fer is sort of self explanatory: http://xenophongroup.com/montjoie/gp_wpns.htm
A period painting in the site above also shows iron/black barrels on handguns.
So, is there anyone out there with more expertise who can point to evidence that some barrels - particularly on organ guns - were made of brass or bronze, or who can confirm a sad, drab uniformity of iron?
I realize that there were some weird materials used early on - logs, leather, etc. I am looking more for the mainsream than such esoterica.
TIA - Skullz
Medieval organ gun and other black powder artillery tubes
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
Skullzgrinda
- Master Sergeant - U-boat

- Posts: 528
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:32 pm
- Location: Dixie
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
I found a couple of references to cast bronze barrels for handguns found in Sweden and Germany, so perhaps there were some bronze hand guns about. As for cannons I think they would be iron, the huge size and the possibility of them exploding probably made iron the metal of choice to cast them in.
http://xenophongroup.com/montjoie/earguns.htm
http://xenophongroup.com/montjoie/earguns.htm
-
karakhanid
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:33 am
- Location: Bara?±ain Navarra Spain
-
peterrjohnston
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am
From what I recall, the early guns were mainly iron; bulky and often with various forms of reinforcement to the barrel.
Bronze cannon were used in increasing numbers mainly for weight saving reasons. This had more to do with being able to cast barrels with less flaws, therefore could be thinner or not reinforced, rather than the actual material weight.
However bronze was more expensive and harder to get in quantity, so there were always iron guns. As a rule of thumb, the more mobile the gun was required to be, the more likely it was made of bronze (unless very small to begin with). I don't think this would be common till after 1500 however.
As iron and steel casting and milling techniques improved, bronze guns rapidly disappeared, but we are talking mid 19th centuary here, long after the middle ages.
Bronze cannon were used in increasing numbers mainly for weight saving reasons. This had more to do with being able to cast barrels with less flaws, therefore could be thinner or not reinforced, rather than the actual material weight.
However bronze was more expensive and harder to get in quantity, so there were always iron guns. As a rule of thumb, the more mobile the gun was required to be, the more likely it was made of bronze (unless very small to begin with). I don't think this would be common till after 1500 however.
As iron and steel casting and milling techniques improved, bronze guns rapidly disappeared, but we are talking mid 19th centuary here, long after the middle ages.
-
peteratjet
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:36 am
There is a reason that the tube of an artillery piece is called the 'barrel' . Early artillery pieces were commonly constructed like barrels, using longitudinal iron sections hammered onto a wooden core, reinforced with iron hoops, then burning out the wooden core.IanP wrote:From what I recall, the early guns were mainly iron; bulky and often with various forms of reinforcement to the barrel.
Bronze cannon were used in increasing numbers mainly for weight saving reasons. This had more to do with being able to cast barrels with less flaws, therefore could be thinner or not reinforced, rather than the actual material weight.
However bronze was more expensive and harder to get in quantity, so there were always iron guns. As a rule of thumb, the more mobile the gun was required to be, the more likely it was made of bronze (unless very small to begin with). I don't think this would be common till after 1500 however.
As iron and steel casting and milling techniques improved, bronze guns rapidly disappeared, but we are talking mid 19th centuary here, long after the middle ages.
http://www.themcs.org/weaponry/cannon/cannon.htm
A cast bronze cannon was a superior weapon, but more difficult to make without flaws. In the 13/14th centuries, iron cannon predominated. The use of bronze cannons increased as castings techniques improved. The gigantic bronze siege artillery used by the Ottomans at Constantinople were cutting edge technology - the super-guns of the day.

