Distributing Light Horse

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
pcelella
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:56 pm
Location: West Hartford, CT USA

Distributing Light Horse

Post by pcelella »

I was contemplating the best way to distribute light horse when using my Catalan Company army. I have two, four stand battlegroups of Albanians (light spear, javelin, sword, average) and two, four stand battlegroups of Turcopoles (average, bow, sword). I've been using these to support one flank of my concentration of Almughavars while they drive their attack in, but I'm thinking it might make more sense, at least in some deployments, to put half the light horse on each flank, holding them in relatively tight to the Almughavar advance (I'm not looking to win the LH skirmisher battle anyway - I just want to hold the flanks long enough for the Almughavars to drive home). If I was to do this, would to make more sense to put one Albanian unit with a Turcopole on each flank, or to put both Turcopoles on one flank with both Albanians on the other? In other words, does one unit of javelin LH complement one unit of bow LH, or is it better to pair up the like troop types if they are separated?

Thanks


Peter C
Sword and Sandal Gaming Blog
http://swordandsandalgaming.blogspot.com/
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

I think it all depends on your opponent especially how he deploys. Your turcopoles are probably better in melee with the sword versus LF so are a more offensive and better ranged than the jav LH are. However 1 of each does make a nice team especially if he has LH to try and chase you off the flank with.
Its a tough call but would likely depend on the opposing army. I say give it a try and see if it works, if it goes down badly add it to the list of silly things not to do in future battles.
Theory is one thing but table top experience will show exactly how it works out for you.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

deadtorius wrote:Your turcopoles are probably better in melee with the sword versus LF so are a more offensive and better ranged than the jav LH are.
The albanians have swords as well. I would mix them. The albanians get a plus at impact that the turks don't they are equal in melee but the turks can shoot from further away. Gives you more options against other LH.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

I agree with Phil (whatever he wrote). The Lt Spear at impact gives them the edge.
pcelella
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:56 pm
Location: West Hartford, CT USA

Post by pcelella »

Or how about the option of getting rid of the Turcopoles entirely then, and having simply four battlegroups of Albanians with the light spear/javelin - two BG's on each wing?

Peter C
Sword and Sandal Gaming Blog
http://swordandsandalgaming.blogspot.com/
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Peter, I think that Bow armed LH are a must for any army to be truely viable. The strength here is the mix. I may be wrong but my experience suggests that 2 BG of LH Bow make every army better.
DavidT
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by DavidT »

I find using a BG with bow in conjunction with a BG of javelin/light spear works well.
The bow armed LH can sit in front of the enemy cavalry and shoot from a safe distance while the javelin armed LH try to get in shots from a safer location. If they are all javelin armed, they have to come closer to shoot from the front and risk getting caught by enemy cavalry (or even nasty lance armed LH).
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”