1.2.3 issues
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
-
Examinondas
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 217
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:42 pm
1.2.3 issues
Couple of minor mistakes:
- In the Medieval Castilian army list, the Grenadine LH unit uses the (Parthian-looking) Grenadine knight image
- Medieval Portuguese army, English allies list, "free company crossbowmen": the "f" is not capital
Keep up the good work!
- In the Medieval Castilian army list, the Grenadine LH unit uses the (Parthian-looking) Grenadine knight image
- Medieval Portuguese army, English allies list, "free company crossbowmen": the "f" is not capital
Keep up the good work!
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
Pierre De Chartreuse
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:44 pm
-
Pierre De Chartreuse
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:44 pm
-
Geordietaf
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:19 pm
Ah, but alcohol and food are easy to convince English to have, but bad spelling and historical mistakes are another matter entirely. It's simply a case of "mistakes, what mistakes? if its good enough for the Bard its good enough for me!" is the academic viewpoint. That's pretty much how they do things here, I mean they are still teaching children in our schools that at the Battle of Hastings King Harold died with an arrow in his eye!Pierre De Chartreuse wrote:Actually, handscript z and g look quite the same in French, so the official English historian must have made a mistake.
However, I could already convince dozens of English people to drink pastis, wine and eat cheese. So replacing a g by a z should be my next mission
-
Pierre De Chartreuse
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:44 pm
Somebody has this error when try to create a french late army??? i dont have any error report when install the patch...

And another question, i notice that in Ordonnance Burgundian men at arms are average mounted but poor dismounted and have the same cost as average-average units in other armies... ooo is correct 18??? i remember that in previous versions average-average are cheaper

And another question, i notice that in Ordonnance Burgundian men at arms are average mounted but poor dismounted and have the same cost as average-average units in other armies... ooo is correct 18??? i remember that in previous versions average-average are cheaper
