We have begun to collect the armies for a future campaign based on the second Punic War and 1st Macedonian War. For something I think I read here in the forum (but can’t find now) I get the impression that Thureophoroi were classed As HF/Mf to cope with older interpretations but that the authors think that they were heavy foot more likely. Is that the case? Especially, for the Second Punic War period.
Another possibility is that they form an intermediate category, sometimes (or in some armies) being the main infantry force, in the role of heavy foot; others, specially in armies with more typical heavy foot, like pikemen, in an auxiliary function and so better represented as Medium Foot. In that case I’m thinking in basing them in MF bases but with the same number of figures as Heavy foot to distinguish them of other MF (with lesser figures) . So they can be deployed as heavy or medium Foot depending of the circumstances. The same with other HF/MF, like Gallic. I have also contemplate the possibility of basing them in 6x2.5 bases (28mm) but don’t think that necessary.
Thanks in advance. All opinions will be very welcome
Thureophoroi and other heavy/medium foot.
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: Thureophoroi and other heavy/medium foot.
Reading this site will explain the thinking behind the HF option - http://www.ne.jp/asahi/luke/ueda-sarson ... ates1.html - there are 2 parts.Rekila wrote:We have begun to collect the armies for a future campaign based on the second Punic War and 1st Macedonian War. For something I think I read here in the forum (but can’t find now) I get the impression that Thureophoroi were classed As HF/Mf to cope with older interpretations but that the authors think that they were heavy foot more likely. Is that the case? Especially, for the Second Punic War period.
Another possibility is that they form an intermediate category, sometimes (or in some armies) being the main infantry force, in the role of heavy foot; others, specially in armies with more typical heavy foot, like pikemen, in an auxiliary function and so better represented as Medium Foot. In that case I’m thinking in basing them in MF bases but with the same number of figures as Heavy foot to distinguish them of other MF (with lesser figures) . So they can be deployed as heavy or medium Foot depending of the circumstances. The same with other HF/MF, like Gallic. I have also contemplate the possibility of basing them in 6x2.5 bases (28mm) but don’t think that necessary.
Thanks in advance. All opinions will be very welcome
IMO as long as they aren't going to be confused with other troops your plan is OK.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:47 pm