Accused of Cheating in DAG Games?
Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft
Accused of Cheating in DAG Games?
Can anyone help me out here? I set up a 1000pt DAG game with another player, I was Roman and he was Armenian. Everything was fine whilst he blatted the hell out of my army with his horse archers and the like and it was still very much fine when his Cataphracts smashed through my legions, but it all went very sour for him when my artillery fired and in one move destroyed a cataphract unit from a range of approximately 20 hex's. He said I was cheating and left the game, all I did was take the choices from the actual DAG list, so I cannot understand at all how he can say that I was cheating. Can any of the designers etc. help me out on this one and tell him that the artillery is a legitimate choice in field battles in the DAG. Here is a screen shot of the last move we did, hope this can be of some help, the artillery is in the top centre behind my troops.
[img][img]http://i806.photobucket.com/albums/yy34 ... 2/arm2.png[/img][/img]
All I can say is that if he thought the artillery was bad, he would have had kittens if he saw the field defences I was going to choose. I do think that despite this, I will pick Romans again now that I have discovered their true strengths.
[img][img]http://i806.photobucket.com/albums/yy34 ... 2/arm2.png[/img][/img]
All I can say is that if he thought the artillery was bad, he would have had kittens if he saw the field defences I was going to choose. I do think that despite this, I will pick Romans again now that I have discovered their true strengths.
Last edited by SRW1962 on Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
petergarnett
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Gatwick, UK
There is a negative modifer on cohesion tests for being fired at my artillery, a -1 one I think. Sounds like he was just unlucky on the test.
If he wants to see that artillery is permitted in the roman republican army then he need only use the DAG to bring up the army list.
Also if someone is not accustomed to the ancient period the word artillery may be mis-leading & be taken as cannons!
If he wants to see that artillery is permitted in the roman republican army then he need only use the DAG to bring up the army list.
Also if someone is not accustomed to the ancient period the word artillery may be mis-leading & be taken as cannons!
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
petergarnett
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Gatwick, UK
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
-
TheGrayMouser
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
-
keithmartinsmith
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm
-
batesmotel
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 3616
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
It's okay Keith, my opponent now has equipped his Cataphracts with greek fire syphons, so he has some chance of destroying my artillery. I have however failed to tell him about 20 foot high stone walls I use as field fortifications they will have to get over first, or the cauldrons of boiling oil that wil be dropped on his troops as they try to get through or over.keithmartinsmith wrote:Hi, Maybe its me missing the April fool but as the game files have been manually edited by the players there is not much we can do to check on a possible bug. Sorry Keith
Well done Richard for spotting the name of my artillery painted on the side of it, even though it was written in the original Greek.
