definition of between
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
definition of between
Had a situation arise today that made us both wonder involving rear support.
As it happened the Romans had a unit of spears providing rear support for 2 4 pak battle groups of legionaries. 1 of the legions auto broke and I got to pursue into the spears, the adjacent legion no longer gets rear support since the rear support is now engaged in melee, however if my pursuit had stopped short of the spears and my front base was behind the rear line of the adjacent legion does that count as being between the rear supporters and the unit wanting to claim it?
Basically the spears were 1/2 behind each legion to provide support for both legions, does my suddenly blocking 1/2 of that spear units front block the rear support?
Hope that was clear enough
As it happened the Romans had a unit of spears providing rear support for 2 4 pak battle groups of legionaries. 1 of the legions auto broke and I got to pursue into the spears, the adjacent legion no longer gets rear support since the rear support is now engaged in melee, however if my pursuit had stopped short of the spears and my front base was behind the rear line of the adjacent legion does that count as being between the rear supporters and the unit wanting to claim it?
Basically the spears were 1/2 behind each legion to provide support for both legions, does my suddenly blocking 1/2 of that spear units front block the rear support?
Hope that was clear enough
-
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm
Page 135: "There are no enemy troops even partly between the BG claiming rear support and the bases giving rear support."
Note the text says "bases" and not "battle group" giving rear support. Therefore I think the spear bases could still supply rear support because there are no enemy troops between them and the supported legionary BG.
Terry G.
Note the text says "bases" and not "battle group" giving rear support. Therefore I think the spear bases could still supply rear support because there are no enemy troops between them and the supported legionary BG.
Terry G.
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
In essence, directly forward of the lefthand half of the spear BG base (it was a 2 base BG of triarii in two ranks), was the Romans claiming rear support, with no part of enemy base between. The righthand half of the spear base had been hit by the pikes. No conforming had happened yet.
So...Romans can claim rear support from the visible half of the triarii base?
So...Romans can claim rear support from the visible half of the triarii base?
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
The counter argument is that the enemy troops are not between the part of the Triarii base that is providing support and the Hastati BG.
I suspect however that a litteral interpretation of the words would say that BG E is partly between the bases providing support and the BG being supported and would probably rule that way if called on as an umpire.
As a 'real world' justification you could say that the Triarii are now a touch distracted by the pursuing enemy BG and that the Hastatii are rather more nervous than they were now the enemy are past their flank.
Code: Select all
HHHH
EEEE
TTAs a 'real world' justification you could say that the Triarii are now a touch distracted by the pursuing enemy BG and that the Hastatii are rather more nervous than they were now the enemy are past their flank.
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
I don't think the counter argument works Hammy because it says "even partly" between. Somethin "partly between" will of course have bits of it's base that are not between and bits that are by definition.hammy wrote:The counter argument is that the enemy troops are not between the part of the Triarii base that is providing support and the Hastati BG.
I suspect however that a litteral interpretation of the words would say that BG E is partly between the bases providing support and the BG being supported and would probably rule that way if called on as an umpire.Code: Select all
HHHH EEEE TT
As a 'real world' justification you could say that the Triarii are now a touch distracted by the pursuing enemy BG and that the Hastatii are rather more nervous than they were now the enemy are past their flank.
The 'real world' explanation works for me. "we're on our own lads, the Triarii will never fight through that lot in time"
-
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
deadtorius
- Field Marshal - Me 410A

- Posts: 5290
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

