800 AP Tibetan for the incompetent
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
khurasan_miniatures
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am
-
Ghaznavid
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:44 am
- Location: Germany
Actually I got it from usually well informed sources that the "0-" bit is just missing.philqw78 wrote:The optional bit is wrong in the list writers opinion.khurasan_miniatures wrote:Ah the optional mandatory camp. So which is wrong, the optional bit or the "1" bit?
Karsten
~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
I was told that by an anonymous whistle blower just before publication after getting a sneak preview of the list. But it didn't change. That and the no bows. Its a Chinese conspiracy.Ghaznavid wrote:Actually I got it from usually well informed sources that the "0-" bit is just missing.
If I'm found dead tomorrow please pretend you did not read this post. And if you're in need of a new liver wait a few days 'til the next one comes along.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
That's 'coz all the players at Usk are better than me so don't need such a simple and one dimensional army.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IN period there are tons of infantry with Heavy Weapons and tons of crossbow, which sorta negates some of the benefits of mounted Heavy Armor. In an open competition you would see some knights....can make these guys tough to play.
Ian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IN period there are tons of infantry with Heavy Weapons and tons of crossbow, which sorta negates some of the benefits of mounted Heavy Armor. In an open competition you would see some knights....can make these guys tough to play.
Ian
-
flamingpig0
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:56 am
Although perhaps Northern Dynasty with lots of Average cataphracts in 6s would have been alright...as long as they didn't have to face elephants!flamingpig0 wrote:Probably as everyone realised that the theme was 'many armies with heavy weapons and crossbows'david53 wrote:Not to sure about this army if you look at the Usk event in the empires book out of 21 teams no Tibetans?
