Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
Although, aren't camels skirmishers? If that is the case, they would not be able to provide rear support to the HF.grahambriggs wrote:It's less than Ethan. But it is in theory effective e.g. 2 ranks of HF Def Sp backed up by camels. Yes they only disorder the front rank so would be better against knights than those that fight in 2 ranks. could be a role for poor HF and poor camels - rear support and affects the fighting!
No, they're Camelry. These are not skirmisherspcelella wrote:Although, aren't camels skirmishers? If that is the case, they would not be able to provide rear support to the HF.grahambriggs wrote:It's less than Ethan. But it is in theory effective e.g. 2 ranks of HF Def Sp backed up by camels. Yes they only disorder the front rank so would be better against knights than those that fight in 2 ranks. could be a role for poor HF and poor camels - rear support and affects the fighting!
Peter C
Interesting...would make these much more resistant to charging lancers.Scrumpy wrote:Assuming the Lost Scrolls ever make it to our local game store ( yes they are living up to their title ! ) you'll fnd that the LPIA with Bedouin allies can have upyo 20 average camels supporting average HF - LS Sw.
True. I will have to experiment with how to use them. Whether in front of the Cv, so as to get the rear support, or to the side.david53 wrote:Only if they arn't shot themsleves in the process.NickW wrote:I would have thought LH lancers would be useful support against shooty LH to protect your cavalry if it is of a close combat type.
