New errata available

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Ghaznavid
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 800
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:44 am
Location: Germany

New errata available

Post by Ghaznavid »

A new official errata (v1.1.6) is now available for DL from the FoG website.
You can download it here.
Karsten


~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

"Terrain pieces (other than villages) cannot be superimposed on a road"

But I thought Villages go down before roads, so can't be superimposed on them. Just being pedantic, but there was pay dirt later:

"P.74 Tibetan
Fortified Camp should not be compulsory" - Hooray (not that the Tibetans have troops to spare to protect it)

Although, again, being pedantic since these are rules, it should read "Fortified Camp is not compulsory". A 'should' doesn't change anything.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Ghaznavid
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 800
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:44 am
Location: Germany

Post by Ghaznavid »

philqw78 wrote:"P.74 Tibetan
Fortified Camp should not be compulsory" - Hooray (not that the Tibetans have troops to spare to protect it)

Although, again, being pedantic since these are rules, it should read "Fortified Camp is not compulsory". A 'should' doesn't change anything.
Well being really pedantic one could say that the text just gives an explanation for the modified army list line below it, which applies to the Tibetan list. So the text does not change the list nor does it need to, the modified Fortified Camp line below the text changes the list. :)
Karsten


~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Ghaznavid wrote:
philqw78 wrote:"P.74 Tibetan
Fortified Camp should not be compulsory" - Hooray (not that the Tibetans have troops to spare to protect it)

Although, again, being pedantic since these are rules, it should read "Fortified Camp is not compulsory". A 'should' doesn't change anything.
Well being really pedantic one could say that the text just gives an explanation for the modified army list line below it, which applies to the Tibetan list. So the text does not change the list nor does it need to, the modified Fortified Camp line below the text changes the list. :)
Bloody practical again
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

I'm just happy about what is not in the errata. No change to the diagram on page 87. Conforming is to nearest legal position, if possible. No move if nearest legal position is blocked. No looking for next nearest legal position.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

gozerius wrote:I'm just happy about what is not in the errata. ...Conforming is to nearest legal position, if possible. No move if nearest legal position is blocked. No looking for next nearest legal position.
they would be amendments
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

List of changes in 1.16 errata from 1.15

Post by SirGarnet »

No rules errata.

Companions w/ page numbers

IF 22 Late Dynastic Egyptian Allies list finally added (*hurrah*).

EE 22 Late Byzantine Angevin Sicilian allies list added.

Page 11: Swifter than Eagles errata
- Chariot Bow capability mislisted in Close Combat columns.
STE 49 Phoenician Allies typo.
STE 73 Phrygian Allies LF Jav are 4 points.

Page 11-12: Oath of Fealty errata
OOF 41 Imperial Germans ignore special instructions re Polish allies.
OOF 49 Feudal German spear cost typo.
OOF 55 Italian Feudal Allies Scutiferi not included in Knights maximum.
OOF 71 Feudal Polish German Allies are "East German Allies".
OOF 76 Later Welsh LH may not dismount as HF.
OOF 84 Early Medieval Frisia and other Free Cantons -limits Allies list options.
OOF 93 Early Plantagenet English Allies list added.

Page 12-14: Empires of the Dragon errata
EOD 74 Tibetan fortified camp is optional.
EOD 85 Khmer or Champa Subject Cav is a 4 base BG.
EOD 94 Koryo Korean Nomad Nobles are Superior.
EOD 112 Xi Xia Fortified camp is optional.
EOD 117 Jin Overall max Chinese inf in separate formations should be 30, Fort. camp is voluntary.
EOD 128 Formatting error for LH.
EOD 153 Yi Korean Nomad Nobes are Superior.

Lost Scrolls:
LS 26 Samnite cavalry formatting error.
LS 49 Pre-Islamic Arabian Javelinmen formatting error.
LS 63 Medieval German City Leagues Mtd Handgunners are 4 per BG.
LS 69 Later Medieval Feudal German Mtd Handgunners are 4 per BG.

Hope this is useful.
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

A Later Sicilian Ally list is still missing for Komnenan Byzantine. Italo-Normas can be used up to 1154. Any chance a Later Sicilian Ally List for Komnenan's after 1154 will be made available?

The Angevin Sicilian list is too late for Komnenan.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”