Usk - 5 army lists, including the winners

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:33 pm

lists from our 4 oppos in Usk now posted

http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... ryo+Korean
http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... o-Skythian
http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... rth+Indian
http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... ou+Chinese

Also reports featuring James Mason, Emperor of Korea under production, expected imminently

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:06 pm

Tim, you noted down our Levy as "useless". Should not that description have been with the rest of the troops in the army as well? (commanders included I suppose)

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:33 pm

I do note a 900 point listed for the same army used by the winners are Usk 2009. Did this one have useless troops and commanders as well? I presume that the 2010 variety was not the the 'including the winners' referred to in the title?

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:48 am

Tim won. His levy may have been useless, but they were far more sensibly positioned and better lead.

kevinj · Post by **kevinj** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:27 am

Tim and Phil,

What figures did you use for Koryo Korean, useless or otherwise?

Cheers,

Kevin

peterrjohnston · Post by **peterrjohnston** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:10 am

philqw78 wrote:Tim won. His levy may have been useless, but they were far more sensibly positioned and better lead.

Wasn't it more a case they actually had leaders? 66

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:14 am

kevinj wrote:Tim and Phil,

What figures did you use for Koryo Korean, useless or otherwise?

Cheers,

Kevin

We used a combination of "the Chinese stuff I bought when I was 19 and have shamelessly used for any vaguely oriental army ever since" and "those nicely painted DBM Mu Jung Hsien Pi double based lancers that otherwise might never see the light of day again" that Brian owned.

Our only "Korean" troops were 6 bases of Irr D LI with Bow I picked up from Alan Touller once.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:04 am

peterrjohnston wrote:
philqw78 wrote:Tim won. His levy may have been useless, but they were far more sensibly positioned and better lead.
Wasn't it more a case they actually had leaders? 66

No they were made out of better lead.

kevinj · Post by **kevinj** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:07 am

the Chinese stuff I bought when I was 19 and have shamelessly used for any vaguely oriental army ever since

Ah, the good old All Purpose Oriental Army, good for everything from Shang to Renaissance Ming! I've got one of those.

philqw78 · Post by **philqw78** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:11 am

Check this thread for some Korean stuff
viewtopic.php?t=13442

Ours was also recycled oriental types.

timmy1 · Post by **timmy1** » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:28 pm

Yes, my Han were caught mascarading (sp?) as Western Wei this past weekend to very little effect. Next time the spear and bow armed Ch'in will have to join in, methinks.

Even I have too much shame to make them Korean! That said my Parthians have doubled as Turks and will soon be Tibetan (thanks to the list advice from Dr. Phil)